Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W2XJ@nyc.rr.com: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:43:54 -0400
Many people DO have problems with DTV and this includes a number of broadcast engineers. This is especially true for those who live in fringe areas that are served by stations arriving from different
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00095.html (15,546 bytes)

42. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:51:57 -0400
If you are really that nervous, stick to the bowtie and possibly a high pass filter. This said with the assumption that the stations you watch are more or less in the same direction. Use a 4 bay vert
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00096.html (12,771 bytes)

43. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:54:56 -0400
Most people report acceptable results on VHF with a UHF bowtie if the V is relatively local. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contest
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00097.html (15,401 bytes)

44. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 14:55:34 -0400
That is what the theory says. In practice if the signal is above the digital cliff it is 100%. What make life more complicated? Many people have height, space and covenant restrictions. They in pract
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00100.html (18,475 bytes)

45. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 19:50:38 -0400
Yes it was. Nobody knew how that might play out and the budget was to finance a science project. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.con
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00111.html (10,265 bytes)

46. Re: [Amps] Amplified TV Antenna (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 19:59:12 -0400
If it is not consumer friendly it is irrelevant. There is a huge information and technology gap these days between consumers and engineers. If OTA TV is to survive, the simple solutions are necessary
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00112.html (23,132 bytes)

47. Re: [Amps] Dedicated RF (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 21:01:52 -0400
I think that at this point in time manufacturing a new tube amp is a bad move. Appropriate tubes of decent quality still being manufactured are difficult to source and will become more so in the futu
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00349.html (9,109 bytes)

48. Re: [Amps] Dedicated RF (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 22:15:35 -0400
A good tube amp is not cheap either. An Alpha 9500 tube amp lists at over $2000 more than a THP 2.5K Solid state. Now, I think that the THP could be bettered for less cost. A lot of new rugged device
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00353.html (10,729 bytes)

49. Re: [Amps] Dedicated RF (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:29:50 -0400
For all that and what it will cost, Solid State is a better way to go. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00356.html (9,266 bytes)

50. Re: [Amps] Dedicated RF (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 20:02:48 -0400
It is really no different than tube amps. In either case the amp must be designed to do the job. Many tube amps can not do RTTY or digital at legal limit. Those that can are not inexpensive. There is
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00373.html (13,463 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 50
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu