Mail Archive Search: <+from:amps@myrealbox.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:amps@myrealbox.com: 56 ]

Total 56 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] Rich is a good guy (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 02:18:43 -0400; OK, guys ... Take this to private e-mail. Attacking or defending any individual is not appropriate here. The personality wars will end or the list will be back to full moderation mode. Amps is not a; /archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00364.html (9,885 bytes)
22. Re: [Amps] Rich is a good guy (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 12:02:44 -0400; If you have PROOF, that's one thing but constantly demanding that others provide the proof, calling their statements "manure," or addressing other posters as if they were novices will not be tolerat; /archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00379.html (9,906 bytes)
23. Re: [Amps] IM distortion and such (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:59:31 -0400; This is not the place to debate state licensing laws or their application to business. You are treading on areas that have been the subject of arguments between licensed Engineers (mostly Civil Engin; /archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00515.html (23,609 bytes)
24. Re: [Amps] Serious transformer problem (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 11:06:16 -0400; Please take these questions to the RFI list. They have plenty of experienced individuals there. 73, ... Administrator amps@contesting.com _______________________________________________ Amps mailing; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00015.html (9,434 bytes)
25. Re: [Amps] Maximum RF output in practical application: 4-250A (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 11:43:10 -0400; While the discussion of ITU regulations and spectrum mask is interesting, international and sovereign regulations is a bit "off topic" for an amps list. 73, ... Administrator amps@contesting.com ____; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00103.html (8,678 bytes)
26. Re: [Amps] Posting in cute font sizes. (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:07:09 -0400; There is no restriction on the font size used for posting to the list. There is a restriction on using HTML - any posting that is 100% html is automatically deleted by the list server. If the posting; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00760.html (8,617 bytes)
27. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 43, Issue 95 (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 23:28:33 -0400; Just a reminder to everyone on the list ... There is absolutely no need to post this kind of message to the list. The list URL is found at the bottom of every message (and the digest). Simply click o; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00909.html (8,188 bytes)
28. [Amps] Spam from Members of this List ... (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 23:40:27 -0400; I have recently received complaints from subscribers to this list of spam from the list. On examining the alleged spam emails, it appears that one or more list subscribers have harvested e-mail addre; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00317.html (6,674 bytes)
29. [Amps] Spam and Meta Discussions about Amps (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 19:14:43 -0400; OK gentlemen and ladies ... The intent of the warning regarding using e-mail addresses in bulk was not an invitation to start a discussion of what constitutes spam, how this list should be run, or ev; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00373.html (7,186 bytes)
30. [Amps] Reply Etiquette ... (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 01:30:09 -0400; I agree entirely with Phil on this. It is totally unnecessary and impolite to respond to a posting by repeating that posting and two or three previous postings while only adding a one line comment th; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00381.html (9,057 bytes)
31. [Amps] Spam from Members of this List ... (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:04:28 -0400; There are two sets of archives for Amps and *all* of the other lists at contesting.com. One is the "standard" downloadable archives: http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/amps/ the other set of archi; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00384.html (7,533 bytes)
32. Re: [Amps] Fwd: Re: Svetlana (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 13:33:55 -0400; George, The reflector software used by contesting.com does not permit attachments. This is done to prevent the transmission of viruses by the list and applies to all contesting.com lists. 73, ... Adm; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00447.html (7,392 bytes)
33. Re: [Amps] Stolen Radio (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:45:14 -0400; OK folks ... this has gotten way outside what is appropriate for Amps. If anyone has a problem or allegation that a stolen radio is being offered on eBay, take it up with eBay's security people - tha; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00615.html (7,957 bytes)
34. Re: [Amps] Rich Measures (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 01:56:35 -0400; Mr. Measures has not been "booted" from the Amps list but he has been removed for consistent activities that violate the rules. Specifically, he continues to quote entire messages with the addition o; /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00141.html (8,153 bytes)
35. Re: [Amps] Gerritsen Sentencing (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:44:34 -0400; OK folks ... The news has been received. Discussion of Jack Gerritsen belongs on HAMLAW or other forums dealing with legal issues and bad operating practices. It is off topic for AMPS. Gerritsen did; /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00231.html (7,080 bytes)
36. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:10:24 -0400; OK ... time to end this thread. There is nothing technical here any discussions of business ethics, trade, etc. belong elsewhere. 73, ... Administrator amps@contesting.com ___________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00387.html (11,309 bytes)
37. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1): Author: Administrator <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:08:15 -0500; I told you morons to stop this thread. Nothing techinical here. Am I going to have to throw you all out of here. The list founder told me to clean up this mess and I will. -- Sign up and get your 30G; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00023.html (6,480 bytes)
38. Re: [Amps] Boycott New Chinese linear Amplifier (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:50:26 -0400; I have modified the group settings so the administrator account cannot be (mis)used again. Unfortunately, this simply proves that the e-mail address on ANY posting to the group can be forged (spoofed; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00026.html (8,483 bytes)
39. Re: [Amps] THE WRECK (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:38:55 -0400; Please do not post this kind of off topic material here and if it is posted, please do not respond to the entire list. 73, ... Administrator amps@contesting.com ______________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00175.html (9,644 bytes)
40. Re: [Amps] History of AMPS (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:27:43 -0500; Please terminate this thread. The individual who posted the first message unsubscribed after posting it so there is no sense in responding to him on the list. Meta discussions concerning the operatio; /archives//html/Amps/2006-11/msg00176.html (8,613 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]