Mail Archive Search: <+from:amps@txrx.demon.co.uk>

Results:

References: [ +from:amps@txrx.demon.co.uk: 190 ]

Total 190 documents matching your query.

61. [AMPS] Re: HT XFMR (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 21:09:39 +0100; HV PS. rated @9kv. (PS puts insulator blew mount all 4 micarta(HV 6800vdc to thing. Float have removed the broadcast HV testing. I've convinced myself it's ok to do this, although I worry about the e; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00576.html (8,750 bytes)
62. [AMPS] Neutralizing HB amp (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 07:21:17 +0100; (outer sleeve sleeve connected appx. 4.5" from anodes to the decreases until the minimum C. I suspect I (grid) sleeve bottles. sleeve. It's hopefully to find to the anodes is the adjustable away my s; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00631.html (8,620 bytes)
63. [AMPS] Peak reading vs True peak (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 22:10:32 +0100; --Original Message-- From: Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> To: 'amps' <amps@contesting.com>; Peter Chadwick <Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 24 June 1999 19:48 Subject: RE:; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00669.html (9,971 bytes)
64. [AMPS] Peak Power Meters - some more thoughts (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 07:03:24 +0100; --Original Message-- From: Peter Chadwick <Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com> To: 'W8JI@contesting.com' <W8JI@contesting.com>; 'amps' <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 25 June 1999 10:54 S; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00720.html (8,849 bytes)
65. [AMPS] KM1H wheres Carl (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:51:22 +0100; --Original Message-- From: John/K4WJ <k4wj@att.net> To: kc2agl@mhv.net <kc2agl@mhv.net>; Jon Ogden <jono@enteract.com> Cc: igor rosky <irosky@yahoo.com>; amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com> To:; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00773.html (8,350 bytes)
66. [AMPS] go figure/Murata (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 06:31:10 +0100; --Original Message-- From: Dick Green <dick.green@valley.net> To: Jon Ogden <jono@enteract.com>; amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 29 June 1999 23:47 Subject:; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00788.html (9,829 bytes)
67. [AMPS] Anyone like clocks? (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 08:32:20 +0100; Please excuse the off topic, but I wondered if anyone going to Dayton was interested in old American clocks? I'd like to get my hands on a few original spares and they are hard to find over here. G3R; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00060.html (6,741 bytes)
68. [AMPS] Bridge vs. Doubler (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 08:28:09 +0100; Original message: I think this isn't true. In FW doubler, each diode conducts on alternate half cycles. In FW bridge, each diode conducts on alternate half cycles. The whole piece was very well put b; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00061.html (10,163 bytes)
69. [AMPS] rice burners/3rd order imd (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 08:37:33 +0100; With everyone using 706s, how do you tell if it's the receiver or transmitter causing the splatter? Steve -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Adminis; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00062.html (8,148 bytes)
70. [AMPS] Bridge vs. Doubler (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 08:08:21 +0100; I'll try to find time to re-measure too. The Spice numbers stack up with data from the 5th ed. RSGB handbook from 20 yrs ago, but that's far from a reliable guaantee! Double checking the bridge syste; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00088.html (11,085 bytes)
71. [AMPS] Bridge vs. Doubler (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 10:00:42 +0100; Now I've woken up properly, I realise that the strain on the insulation is just the same... Steve -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00094.html (8,553 bytes)
72. [AMPS] Bridge vs. Doubler (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 06:53:54 +0100; One thought, largely in ignorance: is the 'less iron' bit really true? If the peak currents in a doubler system are higher, don't you need higher magnetic flux to support that? If that is the case, t; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00109.html (8,882 bytes)
73. [AMPS] Bridge vs. Doubler (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 06:55:23 +0100; Phil, I won't waste space by re-copying the whole piece, but again, thanks, very well put and I doubt that I'm the only one to find it informative. Fortunately there's a few of us left who apply the; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00122.html (9,035 bytes)
74. [AMPS] breakdown in vacuum (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 21:23:00 +0100; Somewhere I have a NASA study about multipaction in rf feeders - I'll see if I can find it and look out the reference details if anyone is interested. Multipaction happens at very low pressure where; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00196.html (7,614 bytes)
75. [AMPS] Solid State Amp Problem (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 07:59:47 +0100; every 6Khz above verified this present at the when driving SWR. The someone caused by appreciate any It could be quite a number of things, including duff original design. If the output power and curr; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00241.html (8,366 bytes)
76. [AMPS] update on 13% eff 6M amp (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 07:56:47 +0100; ago when I had put that puppy probably a large answer is a with my amp to additional coil on coil is in series your blocking coil values, turns is all transformer. You etc. but it a lower You might a; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00349.html (8,379 bytes)
77. [AMPS] parasitic suppressors (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 18:54:57 +0100; snip And the suppressor does stuff all at the vhf frequencies where the tuneC/coil combination looks high impedance. snip Steve -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@; /archives//html/Amps/1999-04/msg00107.html (8,874 bytes)
78. [AMPS] L band oscillation inside tube (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 22:25:55 +0100; We're a dying breed - hopefully not too literally :-) maybe dying out is a better term. There might be some basis to that - I started off working on radar systems, one had a big sign on the dish "RAD; /archives//html/Amps/1999-04/msg00272.html (8,204 bytes)
79. [AMPS] TRW PT6702 or PT6747? (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 10:28:04 +0100; I think that the PT numbers were mostly customer specific, either in testing or for commercial disguise although the actual transistors were usually generic types. A few PT parts made it to general s; /archives//html/Amps/1999-04/msg00367.html (7,633 bytes)
80. [AMPS] Coax relay (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Sat, 24 Apr 1999 07:04:58 +0100; Make sure it's carrying, not switching, the power. Steve -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Pro; /archives//html/Amps/1999-04/msg00385.html (7,731 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]