Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:amps@xmtservices.net: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] 4CX1500B vs 4CX1000A (score: 1)
Author: Shawn Tayler <amps@xmtservices.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 14:35:27 -0700
Hi Guys, Sorry, I missed the posting of my question so I am resending it. Has there been any discussion on the pros and cons of substituting a 4CX1500B for a 4CX1000A in a Collins 30S-1 ampkifier. I
/archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00551.html (6,764 bytes)

2. [Amps] Grounded Screen 4CX1500B (score: 1)
Author: Shawn Tayler <amps@xmtservices.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:12:07 -0800
Hi Guys, Playing with my 30S-1 has gotten me thinking about a project. I've been wanting an amp for 50Mhz for a while and I have 2 4CX1500B's lating around as spares. One would make a nice amp on 6M
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00082.html (6,940 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Grounded Screen 4CX1500B (score: 1)
Author: Shawn Tayler <amps@xmtservices.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 04:50:31 -0800
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:52:44 +0000 Ian White G/GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk> exclaimed: Thank you Ian, I will peruse your site for these! I was curious on the 4CX1000A for 2M in the ARRL book. I thoug
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00087.html (11,294 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Grounded Screen 4CX1500B (score: 1)
Author: Shawn Tayler <amps@xmtservices.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 04:54:13 -0800
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:35:36 -0800 R. Measures <r@somis.org> exclaimed: Hello Rich, Interesting that you say this. I was under that same impression from conversations through the years. I was happy to
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00088.html (9,710 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Grounded Screen 4CX1500B (score: 1)
Author: Shawn Tayler <amps@xmtservices.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:01:20 -0800
Wow Ian, I had totally missed that. The input circuits were right next to the grid circuit and I had simply assumed. Well how about that. Hmmm, very interesting. Kinda burst the bubble for me. I must
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00106.html (11,145 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Grounded Screen 4CX1500B (score: 1)
Author: Shawn Tayler <amps@xmtservices.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 05:22:00 -0800
I have done just the opposite direct for this test, injecting the signal on the output and watching the level in the input. I would adjust the input and output tunning for maximum coupling then the n
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00116.html (9,634 bytes)

7. [Amps] OT- RF Processors (score: 1)
Author: Shawn Tayler <amps@xmtservices.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:55:32 -0800
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:47:29 -0800 R.Measures <r@somis.org> exclaimed: I am curious, if this is not to off topic, if something similar could be said for the RF Speech Processor in the FT-101E? Commen
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00318.html (8,823 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] T networks and harmonics (score: 1)
Author: Shawn Tayler <amps@xmtservices.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 05:52:54 -0800
I know most tuner designs of this style use series capacitance with a shunt inductance. But that doesn't mean it could not be reversed, ie. series inductance with a shunt capacitance. Shawn N7LQ On S
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00127.html (9,847 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu