Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:audioguy@charter.net: 96 ]

Total 96 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] Carbon film or metal oxide film resistors for low-power RF circuits? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:30:25 -0700
In lieu of a Truly Accurate impedance bridge, this sounds like a job for the old MFJ whatever-the-number analyzer. I just finished reading a long-winded paper that asserted that metal oxide had less
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00297.html (9,152 bytes)

22. Re: [Amps] Carbon film or metal oxide film resistors for low-power RF circuits? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:11:20 -0700
Very interesting responses, thanks. DigiKey stocks some Stackpole RNC and "RNCS", which Stackpole claims are "Ideal replacement for costly Tantalum Nitride resistors" . I wasn't able to quickly find
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00317.html (12,277 bytes)

23. Re: [Amps] Carbon film or metal oxide film resistors for low-power RF circuits? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:46:26 -0700
It's not the solder itself that makes the mess. I use solder that apparently has a lot of rosin flux and it leaves a mess on the board. I know there's flux strippers available, but haven't yet tried
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00334.html (14,596 bytes)

24. Re: [Amps] Fixing scratched meters (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:14:12 -0700
I second the Novus suggestion. I use it on my acrylic/plexi windscreens and face shields all the time. If you have scratches that you can feel with your fingernail, start with all visible scratches a
/archives//html/Amps/2009-09/msg00110.html (9,719 bytes)

25. Re: [Amps] AM mode (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:20:29 -0700
The "25% rule" has worked in the past. Some comments, tho: . It would be interesting to know what the community thinks is a good set of operating conditions for an AL-80A on AM. Considering the AL-80
/archives//html/Amps/2009-09/msg00159.html (9,453 bytes)

26. Re: [Amps] Eimac SK-800B Socket (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:55:10 -0700
Assuming the item is otherwise clean: One relatively low-risk method is to line a glass dish with aluminum foil, then soak the item in a heated (boiling or close) preparation of 1/4 cup ordinary baki
/archives//html/Amps/2009-09/msg00270.html (7,740 bytes)

27. Re: [Amps] SB-220: 1,800 Watts Output (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:54:20 -0800
Then that begs the question - Marketing claims aside, what would be an appropriate max output power to run with a SB1000/AL80 ? It's a timely question for me, at least. I have a nice SB1000 that's be
/archives//html/Amps/2009-11/msg00311.html (10,460 bytes)

28. Re: [Amps] SB-220: 1,800 Watts Output (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:57:28 -0800
I was thinking 100 watts carrier/400 watts PEP AM, actually. That would allow me to use the Flex 5000A at roughly the same output level as my old Johnson Viking Valiant. I'm not a "10 minute club" me
/archives//html/Amps/2009-11/msg00318.html (10,808 bytes)

29. Re: [Amps] SB-220: 1,800 Watts Output (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:39:01 -0800
Heh... Well, I was considering operation at 100 watts carrier, 400 watts modulated. I doubt my tubes, PS and other tender components would tolerate 1500 watts carrier and 6KW PEP long enough for the
/archives//html/Amps/2009-11/msg00328.html (9,878 bytes)

30. Re: [Amps] SB-220: 1,800 Watts Output (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:58:11 -0800
From my Henry 3KA manual: "The 3KA is a 3000 watt PEP input (2000 watt nominal output) linear amplifier ..." On the other hand - I wouldn't think a direct comparison to a SB-220 (even with a Dahl tra
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00004.html (9,097 bytes)

31. Re: [Amps] Decent HF directional coupler for RF power meas. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:21:30 -0800
Not to start any trouble here, but what about the newer software-compensated meters/directional couplers sold in the ham market? A quote from a well-known model's marketing material: "Power accuracy
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00067.html (8,857 bytes)

32. Re: [Amps] SB-220: 1,800 Watts Output (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:00:36 -0800
My 3KA runs around 4050V unkeyed @ 247VAC line voltage. (line voltage is high and stiff here) And it does have the choke as well. I could look up the bleeder resistors if anyone is interested in the
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00110.html (9,637 bytes)

33. Re: [Amps] Advice (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:28:52 -0800
Here's a question from another angle: Say I use two 8877's instead of one (with proper cooling and whatever else is required) and run 1500W PEP output SSB, would the two tube version run more hours t
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00126.html (8,948 bytes)

34. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:45:21 -0800
And I'd like to hear more about expectations of what a single GS-35B will do under in-spec operating conditions. Bill's numbers are in-spec at the edge of the published limits. My question has to do
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00420.html (9,872 bytes)

35. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:15:42 -0800
Thanks to those that replied with the "Prometheus". Whatever the reason, it hadn't grabbed my attention until now. I'll do a little investigation, but at first glance I didn't see any review referenc
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00448.html (9,191 bytes)

36. Re: [Amps] Alpha 78 Problem (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:15:34 -0800
Apologies for hijacking the thread, but speaking of the Alpha 77 bias, is there a preferred method for defeating the "active" part? I remember seeing somewhere that some revs had a pot for adjusting
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00559.html (9,652 bytes)

37. Re: [Amps] alpha 76a (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:36:07 -0800
That's about what I get from mine. Which reminds me - I haven't had power on it for a couple of years. I wonder if anything will go 'bang' when I turn it on... 73, Jim, N7CXI ________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00065.html (8,475 bytes)

38. Re: [Amps] which HV connector to use? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:17:40 -0800
Assuming one doesn't insist on using the Millen connectors, what's a good alternative? Someone mentioned RG-214 a few pages back but having been there, done that and arced most of the common connecto
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00119.html (10,175 bytes)

39. Re: [Amps] Source for large purchase of toroids? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:34:38 -0800
Good point. Since we're on the topic, I've seen references to Fair-Rite #31 toriod cores in various places, but haven't been able to find any in their catalog. Do they actually exist in the wild? Bea
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00350.html (10,517 bytes)

40. Re: [Amps] Source for large purchase of toroids? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:00:31 -0800
Aha! I hadn't thought to check the "cable core" dimensions for one that looks like a toroid. That was the missing piece. They don't specifically have toroids in #31, but they have cable cores with th
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00352.html (13,130 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu