Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:audioguy@q.com: 156 ]

Total 156 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [Amps] To rewind or not? (3KA resonant filter choke) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:15:00 -0800
Good idea with the scope, thanks. I do have a 100:1 5KV probe, but haven't used it on a 4KV supply before. I have to admit I'm nervous about that. I just bought a DSO and the new scope smell hasn't w
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00083.html (10,380 bytes)

42. [Amps] Safety choke question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 02:20:34 -0800
So what do you all think about using an RF Parts RFC-3 (225 uh 1.5A 4KV) plate choke as the safety choke for a large HF amp? The supply is 4KV at up to 2A, bridge rectifier with 32uf of filter. Altho
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00114.html (7,451 bytes)

43. Re: [Amps] Safety choke question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:44:56 -0800
Hi Carel. I don't think I can get enough inductance with any reasonably sized stack of powdered-iron cores, but perhaps ferrite. I'll check into it. Thanks, Jim N7CXI ________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00123.html (9,730 bytes)

44. [Amps] Follow-up on "talking" 3KA choke, other notes (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:35:42 -0800
The "talking" or "chattering" 3KA choke issue is resolved. Believe it or not, what fixed it was one of the following: (1) Replacing the original carbon comp resistors in the parasitic suppressors wit
/archives//html/Amps/2012-01/msg00270.html (8,290 bytes)

45. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 110, Issue 2 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:53:20 -0800
I can see doing those things as a learning experiment, but if the goal is an inexpensive load you can get NOS Florida RF 250-watt flange mount resistors from Henry Radio on eBay for $24.95, or 800-wa
/archives//html/Amps/2012-02/msg00003.html (10,666 bytes)

46. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 110, Issue 2 (correction) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:58:23 -0800
Sorry, make that 3200W instead of 3600W . I apparently can't multiply in my head any more. 73, Jim N7CXI -- I can see doing those things as a learning experiment, but if the goal is an inexpensive lo
/archives//html/Amps/2012-02/msg00004.html (11,638 bytes)

47. [Amps] Current thinking on HV supply bleeder current? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:42:45 -0800
I have a 3KV, 2A CCS transformer, and 32uf of filter. What's the current state of argument for appropriate bleeder current? The last time this came up I seem to remember seeing everything from "HV sa
/archives//html/Amps/2012-02/msg00322.html (6,916 bytes)

48. Re: [Amps] Current thinking on HV supply bleeder current? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:49:33 -0800
[forgot to CC this back to the list] Thanks, Jim. I believe your comments about heavier bleeder current being a carry-over are probably true. I'm going to pencil in four 100k, 20-watt resistors with
/archives//html/Amps/2012-02/msg00324.html (9,791 bytes)

49. Re: [Amps] Current thinking on HV supply bleeder current? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:45:50 -0800
Thanks to all that replied, on and off the list. It seems that the sum of popular opinion is: (1) With a C-input filter, bleeders are a safety issue only, otherwise just generate heat in the room, ra
/archives//html/Amps/2012-02/msg00327.html (13,882 bytes)

50. [Amps] Elecraft W2, or other"best" meter for tweaking the beast(s)? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:07:57 -0800
Has anyone tried the Elecraft W2 bar-graph wattmeter for tweaking their legal-limit amp? I read somewhere that the peak-hold is something like a second. If so, probably too long to be useful for my p
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00043.html (8,388 bytes)

51. Re: [Amps] Elecraft W2, nope (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:36:46 -0800
I do some QSY'ing up and down the band going from this group to that one, and rather than switch off to the dummy load I'll sometimes tweak for the freq change on SSB or AM voice peaks as I transmit.
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00047.html (10,543 bytes)

52. Re: [Amps] Filter Chokes (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:34:20 -0800
You could determine the light-current inductance by hooking it in series with a suitable capacitor, then using an audio generator and a scope to find resonance. It's most likely they are indeed swing
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00089.html (10,928 bytes)

53. Re: [Amps] Filter Chokes (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:38:47 -0800
Correction: Make that a voltage dip, not spike, sorry. I was thinking of series resonance in a normal circuit, not as wired on the bench. In any case, where the meter does something interesting is th
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00090.html (11,894 bytes)

54. [Amps] Gettering GU-74B's in-place with screen voltage? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 23:47:00 -0700
Is there any reason I shouldn't getter a set of GU-74B's in-place in the amp with blower air, filaments hot, and with grid and screen bias applied, but with the plate caps lifted? The amp in question
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00135.html (7,153 bytes)

55. Re: [Amps] Gettering GU-74B's in-place with screen voltage? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:03:54 -0700
Hi Russ, That seems to be the most common opinion, thanks. The annoying part is that I gathered all the parts for my DIY HiPot tester over a year ago, and never had or took the time to build it. I've
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00149.html (10,289 bytes)

56. Re: [Amps] Gettering GU-74B's in-place with screen voltage? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:48:58 -0700
I don't really know what they use either, which is annoying. "People say" it's on the cathode, which certainly would be convenient. LY1DQ's datasheet says the tube is indirectly heated, which makes i
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00153.html (10,579 bytes)

57. Re: [Amps] Transfer Lettering (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:34:05 -0700
ChartPak has black dry transfer lettering in various sizes: 8-12pt (up to 1/4") http://www.pcbsupplies.com/servlet/the-318/Dry-Transfer-Lettering/Detail 16-point (5/32") on closeout http://www.pcbsup
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00156.html (7,614 bytes)

58. [Amps] Hi-Pot testing a tetrode? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:18:07 -0700
I haven't had the privilege of hi-pot testing a tetrode before. Just based on how they're built, it seems to me that plate to screen would be be the most likely thing to test. Comments? Also, what wo
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00161.html (7,363 bytes)

59. Re: [Amps] Hi-Pot testing a tetrode? (never mind) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:23:53 -0700
Never mind, I should have looked at the archives. 73, Jim N7CXI _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00162.html (7,537 bytes)

60. Re: [Amps] Ducting Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:42:17 -0700
If there's room where the duct exits the rear of the amp, a "noise sweep" will reduce noise - at least that conducted through the air in the line - substantially. Take a 90-degree dryer hose coupler
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00216.html (10,378 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu