Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:carlseye@tampabay.rr.com: 346 ]

Total 346 documents matching your query.

281. [Amps] transformers (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 12:39:49 -0500
Mark : if you read this , I e-mailed you about the transformers you mentioned here but my messages bounced. If you still have them please mlet me know with a good e-mail address. !! Thanks carl / kz5
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00692.html (6,438 bytes)

282. [Amps] amp (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:00:43 -0500
Considering the 30k resistor in the cathode of the GU84 single tube amp. didn't anyone see the 15Uh choke across that resistor.?? That's what I see. !!! carl / kz5ca _________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00737.html (6,556 bytes)

283. Re: [Amps] T networks and harmonics (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 19:17:58 -0500
In reply to all this discussion, !! How , and /or where does Our Wonderful FCC , expect the "average" Ham to "buy and or borrow" the the required "expertise and/or equipment to check all this output
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00143.html (10,411 bytes)

284. Re: [Amps] T networks and harmonics (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:17:46 -0500
Jim: I certainly appreciate your response to my msg. Back when I was a "novice" we didn't have the equipment we have today , but we did the best we could with what we had.!!! However: : As I said, ho
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00146.html (10,561 bytes)

285. Re: [Amps] Clipperton L power output LOW (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:29:55 -0500
Unless I miss my guess, either your HV is way down or your metering ckt. is bad. For 572B's you should have at least 2200 volts DC under load. Have you measured it with an external meter?? This is ju
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00228.html (9,409 bytes)

286. [Amps] bama (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:15:46 -0500
does anyone here know how to get into the bama site. I've been there in the past but now they ask for an ID and password.????? carl / kz5ca _______________________________________________ Amps mailin
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00287.html (6,330 bytes)

287. [Amps] boonton 59 (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 10:41:29 -0500
I have acquired a boonton 59 dipper. In looking at the innards I am curious about the oscillator"tube" !! The unit works fine on all bands , but if that osc. fails, where would anyone ever find a rep
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00347.html (6,467 bytes)

288. [Amps] boonton 59 (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:26:04 -0500
Thanks to all who replied to my questions on the subject unit.!! I now have a better understanding of the unit.!! Now I'll try to get a schematic of the unit !!! thanks again to all. !! carl / kz5ca
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00353.html (6,838 bytes)

289. [Amps] QSK (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:14:07 -0500
If you are an "avid" dxer , Qsk may be a TOOL, But to the avg ham , how important is it.??? In the day to day communications of the typ.Ham who really cares ????? I know It doesn't make one iota of d
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00407.html (6,800 bytes)

290. Re: [Amps] DIN stands for....? (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:42:27 -0500
_______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00536.html (10,953 bytes)

291. Re: [Amps] DIN stands for....? (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:43:24 -0500
OOOPPS.!!! carl / kz5ca -- Original Message -- From: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net> To: <amps@contesting.com>; "RTTY List" <rtty@contesting.com> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 7:16 PM Subject: [A
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00537.html (10,938 bytes)

292. [Amps] sockets (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:12:19 -0500
I'm prospecting for two good sockets for 813's.No real hurry, just starting to gather parts for a future project (if I live that long).l!! For that matter , If I Could get a couple good tubes I might
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00597.html (6,331 bytes)

293. [Amps] HB amps (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 19:47:37 -0500
Am I out of the logic loop when considering a pair of 813's for an amp?? I know there are a lot of "fancy, new " tubes out there, but can they compete with the "old stuff" in the 1 KW class , insofar
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00027.html (6,444 bytes)

294. Re: [Amps] Applying power after many years - advice? (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 18:51:47 -0500
Kris : after 20 years , My biggest concern would be for the caps in the hv power supply.!! They may or may not be able to stand up to the voltages in the HV supply. !! IF, however, you bring them up
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00142.html (9,144 bytes)

295. [Amps] amps < etc : (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 19:13:13 -0500
I have seen many references to * old* articles here on this reflector, and I'm sure some of them may be recent, BUT, How many of us have a *memory* that long , to find them.??? Also, many of those re
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00145.html (7,153 bytes)

296. Re: [Amps] PIN diodes TSPA (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 19:34:12 -0500
So , where can we get these articles from *ham radio mag * ?? carl / kz5ca -- Original Message -- From: "John T. M. Lyles" <jtml@lanl.gov> To: <amps@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 7:19
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00147.html (8,443 bytes)

297. Re: [Amps] SB-220 Unmodification (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:34:47 -0500
You gotta hand it those who are still willing to tackle a job like that.!! I'd dearly love to get my hands on something like that>>!! As it is I've got my hands full with projects that may or may not
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00256.html (10,204 bytes)

298. Re: [Amps] "I gotta tell this" (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:10:36 -0500
So what's wrong with QRP ??? Too many of us are using WAY more power than needed for reasonable communication !!! any arguments here?? I doubt it !!!! carl / kz5ca -- Original Message -- From: "N7HIY
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00755.html (11,433 bytes)

299. Re: [Amps] "I gotta tell this" (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:44:07 -0500
I don't communicate much very nowadays, but when I do I use only what I need .!!! Granted , there are times when more power is needed, BUT, when the guy down the street thinks he needs a kw to talk t
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00761.html (10,265 bytes)

300. Re: [Amps] "I gotta tell this" (score: 1)
Author: "carl s." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 19:26:32 -0500
Well , even with my qrp (ooopps) little rig I sometimes use an amp. !! Not a big one , mind you , but an amp neverthe less.!! And who said this list has to be a kw or more.?? carl / kz5ca is a member
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00768.html (11,295 bytes)

Current List: 281 - 300
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]
This search system is powered by Namazu