Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:craxd1@verizon.net: 834 ]

Total 834 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [Amps] For cats sake! (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 19:43:42 -0500
Colin, If it happens anything like the movie National Lampoons Christmas Vacation, he wont need to make an excuse as all will be left is a black smoldering spot in the outline of a cat on the floor,
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00105.html (8,678 bytes)

322. Re: [Amps] For cats sake! (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 19:45:50 -0500
That or a choke with enough inductive reactance to drop the voltage as that's all a variac is. Put it in the primary side and figure for the current drawn through it to size it. Best, Will ** REPLY S
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00106.html (8,291 bytes)

323. Re: [Amps] For cats sake! (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 23:11:45 -0500
Bill, It's according to how you hook it up. If you connect one end of the variacs winding to the line, and the output to the wiper (going to the load), leaving the other side of the variacs winding u
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00110.html (10,030 bytes)

324. Re: [Amps] For cats sake! (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 08:13:24 -0500
Rich, Isn't a choke an iron core with one coil on it? What if we put a tap on the choke, that's the same at the wiper on the back, only it moves from coil to coil. One could say an autotransformer is
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00113.html (10,057 bytes)

325. Re: [Amps] For cats sake! (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 08:31:22 -0500
I need to clarify one thing I said below. That doesn't mean adding a variac set up as a choke to the secondary HV side, it means to use a regular choke. I don't think I'd want to handle a variac with
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00114.html (11,413 bytes)

326. Re: [Amps] cleaning contacts and pots? (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 11:18:38 -0500
For relay contacts, you can try some of the chemicals by GC Electronics. The old way is to use a contact burnisher which GC makes also. The last way I found was to use CLR. That's right, CLR from the
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00119.html (8,648 bytes)

327. Re: [Amps] HB Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:28:13 -0500
According to Shuguang Tube in China, they're making new 813's and 811's if I recall. http://www.shuguangtubes.com/ English Pages; http://enshuguangtubes.chsee.com/oldchsee/shuguangtubes/index.asp Pro
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00125.html (10,715 bytes)

328. Re: [Amps] HB Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:31:53 -0500
-- CURRENT GLASS TUBE MANUFACTURERS (not counting exotic devices, such as photomultipliers and microwave devices) by Eric Barbour--October 1997 -- CHINA: Shuguang Electrical Factory No. 1, Shuguang:
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00126.html (15,261 bytes)

329. [Amps] A $500 amp! (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:49:21 -0500
Wont say a word, just look; http://cgi.ebay.com/One-Tube-3-500z-Amplifier-500-Bird-RMS-1500-Bird-PEP_W0QQitemZ5873733472QQcategoryZ48700QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem Best, Will _______________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00156.html (6,694 bytes)

330. Re: [Amps] Dentron Clipperton QRO (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:50:11 -0500
John, RF Parts used to sell a reprint of it as I bought one once from them. Best, Will ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** On 3/6/06 at 8:49 PM John Strunck wrote: _______________________________________________ A
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00157.html (7,381 bytes)

331. Re: [Amps] A $500 amp! (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 10:04:18 -0500
Mike, What made me jaw drop was how they had the HV lead coming out of that plywood box and the way it went into the amp. They had the wire going through an un-insulated hole where the power cord use
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00165.html (8,814 bytes)

332. Re: [Amps] confused reading amidon ferrite specs? (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 11:16:58 -0500
Dan, For 2-30 MHz, the guy a Palomar Engineers said to use 61 in place of 43. Their literature says to look at the frequency spec of each transformer (which is for narrow band types), and for broadba
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00168.html (8,989 bytes)

333. Re: [Amps] confused reading amidon ferrite specs? (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 12:26:49 -0500
61 mix u = 125 For RFI: 1-1000 MHz For Coils: .2 to 10 MHz For Xfmrs: .2 to 100 MHz Is the only one that covers the full range from 160 to 6 meters or 2-30 MHz for that matter. Amidon and Fair-Rite
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00176.html (11,259 bytes)

334. Re: [Amps] confused reading amidon ferrite specs? (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 22:05:04 -0500
Dan, ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** I'd give Amidon or Fair-Rite a call or an e-mail and ask them their recommendation. Just stack two sets of toroids side by side like everyone does. You'll need tow pieces o
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00182.html (13,889 bytes)

335. Re: [Amps] confused reading amidon ferrite specs? (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 22:33:17 -0500
Let me make a correction on the size of toroids they've been using. Instead of 1/4" thick, they used 1/2" thick, 1/2" OD, and 0.3" ID. Palomar number F-50B. 1/4" thick is almost as much in price as a
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00183.html (15,161 bytes)

336. Re: [Amps] Bird accuracy, etc. (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 11:31:54 -0500
Peter, What I've found is there's a lot of meters out there just as good as, if not better than a Bird 43. Bird uses the simple principle of using a strip line (their term thru-line) to measure power
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00203.html (9,395 bytes)

337. Re: [Amps] Observations on a Pi-L tank (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:11:11 -0500
See below, ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** Because the current moves towards the outside of the conductor as you increase frequency thus called the skin effect. In this respect, the tubing will handle more cur
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00258.html (11,642 bytes)

338. Re: [Amps] Oscilloscopes (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 00:27:57 -0500
I have a 453 here that worls like a champ to this day. Setup the same with 6 nuvistors. Those were some pretty darn tough old scopes if they had been taken decent care of. The only fault I really had
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00261.html (8,865 bytes)

339. Re: [Amps] Oscilloscopes (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 01:22:03 -0500
Bill, Same here. I repaired a few tube sets in the tail end of them around 1980 while a few was still left, and know the sets your talking about. I never did change one out of a TV, nor even test one
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00263.html (9,583 bytes)

340. Re: [Amps] Microwave Oven Autopsy (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 19:22:22 -0500
Marv, Did you check to see if one of the windings was connected to the core, and if the core had a shunt in it? That is what most have that I've seen. Another thing that really ticks me about their m
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00306.html (10,349 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu