Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat@copper.net: 220 ]

Total 220 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:09:24 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- I'd beware of a company which does not know the difference between "affect" and "effect". Makes me wonder about their attention to detail. Bill, W6WRT ________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01335.html (9,590 bytes)

162. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:15:13 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- You make it sound as if Joe Ham could slap an amplifier together over a weekend and live happily ever after. Nothing could be further from the truth. The desig
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01336.html (8,755 bytes)

163. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:18:36 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- We should like them for that? Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01337.html (8,908 bytes)

164. Re: [Amps] plexiglas isolation in coils (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:31:38 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Try the same thing on RTTY and get back to us. :-) Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01339.html (9,595 bytes)

165. Re: [Amps] plexiglas isolation in coils (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:34:44 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- It "isn't on 160"? Do I have to send back my QSL cards? :-) It's a challenge to be sure, but one might as well say "No one does EME because it doesn't work ver
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01340.html (9,829 bytes)

166. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:37:38 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- "Attention to detail" would include having a native English speaker proofread. I stand by my comment. Bill, W6WRT _____________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01341.html (9,671 bytes)

167. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:19:12 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- As you will find out as you go through life, attention to detail comes down from the top and either does or does not pervade a company. Don't make too much of
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01345.html (10,032 bytes)

168. Re: [Amps] plexiglas isolation in coils (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:24:04 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Wild guesses are allowed if they are identified as such. Mine was. Are you sure the early production - the one I had - used #10? Perhaps it was changed to #10
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01346.html (10,538 bytes)

169. Re: [Amps] plexiglas isolation in coils (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:11:39 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Ok, I'll take your word. So the next question is why did the plastic supports melt when operated within the advertised ratings, not once but twice? Was #10 wir
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01353.html (10,987 bytes)

170. Re: [Amps] plexiglas isolation in coils (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 07:59:35 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: <snip> <snip> -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Is that so? Take a second look at the following post from yourself: -- -- "Wild guesses"? If that isn't mocking, what is it? As you may recall, I
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01382.html (10,574 bytes)

171. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 08:12:49 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Point taken, made my day! :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01383.html (8,538 bytes)

172. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:12:31 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- "England and America are two countries divided by a common language." -- George Bernard Shaw _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01388.html (8,240 bytes)

173. Re: [Amps] Tube Prices (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 11:06:33 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Wow. For that you could buy about 30 GS-35b's and get another kw anode dissipation too. Each. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01395.html (9,011 bytes)

174. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 19:01:22 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- This statement makes no sense. I was ticked off *before* you slowed the blower, not after. The amp I had was early production before the duty cycle derating. W
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01410.html (9,303 bytes)

175. Re: [Amps] AL811, AL811H or AL572 mods to 6m (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 09:03:21 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Many people change the tune and load capacitors when converting one of these to six meters, but that is totally unnecessary. Adding a simple coil between anode
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00048.html (8,501 bytes)

176. Re: [Amps] AL811, AL811H or AL572 mods to 6m (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 09:21:20 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- The original capacitors are just fine if you have a tube load impedance of 400-600 ohms. The added coil creates an L-network which transforms the approx 4000 o
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00050.html (8,607 bytes)

177. Re: [Amps] AL811, AL811H or AL572 mods to 6m (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:55:03 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- I'll keep that in mind, but no problem so far. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00052.html (8,540 bytes)

178. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 18:38:13 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Say what? I thought GDOs only detected parallel resonances. I was taught that to check a series resonance one had to connect the two open ends together, thus m
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00061.html (6,960 bytes)

179. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 20:50:17 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- You missed the point of my question. You stated that a GDO can be used to find a series resonance. My understanding is that's not correct. Is it? Bill, W6WRT _
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00064.html (7,878 bytes)

180. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 07:01:43 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- In an earlier post you said "Series resonances, which mean the grid is most effective, will show up on a GDO." Your post above says the opposite. Did you mis-s
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00089.html (9,118 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
This search system is powered by Namazu