Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat@outlook.com: 433 ]

Total 433 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [Amps] Sunset of old technologies (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 03:55:10 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: If you get a chance, take a look at one of the FlexRadio 6xxx series and especially the spectrum display on a full screen second monitor. Play around wit
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00185.html (8,733 bytes)

282. [Amps] Cost of ownership (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 04:04:02 +0000
I keep seeing complaints about the cost of high powered amps. If you want to keep it cheap, buy a good used one, late production, and run it for a few years. You can probably sell it for what you pai
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00186.html (6,669 bytes)

283. Re: [Amps] Sunset of old technologies (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 23:37:27 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: You sure you want one of them newfangled coffins? We could just lay you out in the woods. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT ____________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00193.html (8,817 bytes)

284. Re: [Amps] Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 05:18:31 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I'm sure commercial manufacturers are well aware of this. The last thing they want is a reputation for making lemons, a sure road to bankruptcy. The more
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00200.html (9,419 bytes)

285. Re: [Amps] Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 09:09:49 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Good point. Induced voltage from a nearby lightning strike could be a serious problem. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amp
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00204.html (8,746 bytes)

286. Re: [Amps] Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 19:42:01 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: My IC-746 was severely damaged by a lighting strike before I became wise to lightning. Motherboard replaced. Now you have heard of one. No doubt there ar
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00224.html (9,236 bytes)

287. Re: [Amps] Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 22:52:32 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: At that voltage it is tempting to directly rectify the AC line, greatly simplifying power supplies. Of course proper ground isolation practices must be t
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00233.html (8,503 bytes)

288. Re: [Amps] Fwd: Amps Digest, Vol 172, Issue 39 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 03:30:44 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I suspect very few PW-1 owners know what it costs to do a power supply repair on that unit: $2000. They don't repair, they replace. When I found that out
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00241.html (8,505 bytes)

289. Re: [Amps] Jennings RB8A voltage rating? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:24:59 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Try Max-Gain Systems in Marietta, Georgia USA. http://www.mgs4u.com/index.html You may be able to find what you have in their catalog and if not, give th
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00246.html (7,858 bytes)

290. Re: [Amps] GS-35B test at low voltage (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 07:37:52 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: According to several reports on this group, the GS-35b needs to be run at an anode voltage of about 4000 VDC to get decent efficiency. I built one that r
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00256.html (7,489 bytes)

291. Re: [Amps] Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 17:05:23 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: What do you call "dirty as heck"? Haven't they passed FCC acceptance? Is that not good enough? Of course if you insist on parking your signal right next
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00272.html (9,205 bytes)

292. Re: [Amps] Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 19:49:52 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: So as long as you are over 1 km away, anything goes? I know that's not what you mean, but it illustrates the problem of writing a spec that will satisfy
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00279.html (9,460 bytes)

293. Re: [Amps] Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:45:14 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Cost. 50 VDC 3 kW supplies are available on eBay dirt cheap. Obsolete telephone equipment. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00287.html (8,527 bytes)

294. Re: [Amps] Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:49:56 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I have to disagree with the above. The pressing need for hams today is not technology and theory but rather operating skill. Few hams today are into desi
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00302.html (9,970 bytes)

295. Re: [Amps] Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 17:09:13 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Not really obsolete. Just add a 13.8 VDC supply in series. Close enough. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00303.html (8,792 bytes)

296. Re: [Amps] Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 01:03:59 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Not denying it. When I took my Technician test in 1957 I was required to hand draw a simple tube oscillator. That is no longer required so you could say
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00320.html (10,316 bytes)

297. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 01:09:30 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Real honest-to-God emergencies should be done on phone, whether SSB, FM or whatever. Relying on CW will get people killed. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00321.html (10,172 bytes)

298. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 07:33:10 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I'm sure if the Titanic radio op had voice capability he would have used it first. Of course in the Titanic case it wouldn't have mattered since the only
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00323.html (10,836 bytes)

299. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 07:34:55 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I can't prove it but I suspect a scream for help will be far more effective. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00324.html (10,615 bytes)

300. Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 08:03:45 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I'm picturing you way out in the boonies, far from cell phone range, and you come across a terrible auto accident. You say to the survivors "Wait a minut
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00326.html (10,807 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu