Mail Archive Search: <+from:g8gsq@qsl.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:g8gsq@qsl.net: 314 ]

Total 314 documents matching your query.

141. [AMPS] gs35 internals (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:48:39 -0000; Brought some higher mag to bear (results remind me of how my eyesight is failing). On the grid picture, the big spot at 11 has cratering and buckling on the cathode. One 'link' of grid wire is missin; /archives//html/Amps/2002-02/msg00185.html (9,107 bytes)
142. [AMPS] Power out indicator (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:50:06 -0000; --Original Message-- From: Peter Chadwick <Peter.Chadwick@zarlink.com> To: amps <amps@contesting.com>; 'W8JI@contesting.com' <W8JI@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 19 February 2002 08:; /archives//html/Amps/2002-02/msg00197.html (9,161 bytes)
143. [AMPS] Power out indicator (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 13:59:10 -0000; here - Maybe it's in the definition, but I think you can't have any Q you choose in a pi network - isn't there a minimum value? If you plot the matching on a Smith chart, and add some constant Q curv; /archives//html/Amps/2002-02/msg00200.html (9,066 bytes)
144. [AMPS] Power out indicator (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 07:32:04 -0000; I agree there's little doubt that the L network rarely has a significant advantage compared with the tuning flexibility of the others. Correcting a previous comment of mine, where there are reactive; /archives//html/Amps/2002-02/msg00206.html (8,872 bytes)
145. [AMPS] Power Limitations in Other Countries (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 07:21:40 -0000; Without looking up any info., I think there's few (if any) countries in and around Europe that allow as much as 1500W. The UK limit is 400. suppose I always thought that power limits were waived for; /archives//html/Amps/2002-01/msg00059.html (7,736 bytes)
146. [AMPS] Input matching experiment (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 07:41:44 -0000; Steve -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/2002-01/msg00096.html (10,040 bytes)
147. [AMPS] pills and rc feedback (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (g8gsq@qsl.net); Date: 21 Jan 2002 18:57:53 -0000; sorry for the late reply - spamcop has the whole of the UK's biggest ISP blocked so I couldn't post to the reflector. I'm trying this through a webmail account. To: <amps@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WW; /archives//html/Amps/2002-01/msg00157.html (9,210 bytes)
148. [AMPS] pills and rc feedback (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:44:51 -0000; --Original Message-- From: Ian White, G3SEK <G3SEK@ifwtech.com> To: amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com> Cc: Bill Fisher, W4AN <fisher@akorn.net> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 22 January 2002; /archives//html/Amps/2002-01/msg00162.html (8,487 bytes)
149. [AMPS] pills and rc feedback (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:07:54 -0000; It's lousy value for money :-) Steve -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@conte; /archives//html/Amps/2002-01/msg00166.html (7,439 bytes)
150. [AMPS] UK ebay items (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 07:34:57 -0000; A couple of items at www.ebay.co.uk, possibly of interest: under consumer electronics/radio eqpt/ham, a copy of Eimac's 'Care and feeding...' under consumer electronics/test eqpt, 3pcs unused 8121 I'; /archives//html/Amps/2002-01/msg00215.html (6,552 bytes)
151. [AMPS] Shunt regulated high voltage psu (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:49:58 -0000; --Original Message-- From: Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> To: amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com>; Ian White, G3SEK <g3sek@ifwtech.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 29 January 2002 11:15 Su; /archives//html/Amps/2002-01/msg00253.html (10,410 bytes)
152. [AMPS] Shunt regulated high voltage psu (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 18:39:00 -0000; of a Certainly, in that configuration. There's numerous valves where the reverse screen current appears to low or non-existent (4CX800 for example), where dumping 40+mA all the time in a shunt regula; /archives//html/Amps/2002-01/msg00274.html (12,642 bytes)
153. [AMPS] Shunt regulated high voltage psu (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 07:42:58 -0000; --Original Message-- From: rich <2@mail.vcnet.com> To: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@qsl.net>; AMPS <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 29 January 2002 22:03 Subject: Re: [AMPS] Shunt regul; /archives//html/Amps/2002-01/msg00300.html (10,464 bytes)
154. [AMPS] found connectors but now : cable ? (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 07:46:40 -0000; ....and the centre pin of the plug stands proud of the body and you can touch the centre connector of the socket and they're horrible to assemble....... I can't think of a single good thing to say ab; /archives//html/Amps/2002-01/msg00301.html (8,802 bytes)
155. [AMPS] Shunt regulated high voltage psu (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:21:08 -0000; To: <amps@contesting.com> where Possibly or probably - I'll find out when I fire one up (anyone out there save me the bother?). They put -ve contours on the 4CX1600B so maybe they just cut and pasted; /archives//html/Amps/2002-01/msg00308.html (12,272 bytes)
156. [AMPS] Shunt regulated high voltage psu (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:40:50 -0000; I'm going to have to build this up and hook the storage 'scope on! The way I worked it was to assume 2kVish arcing to screen limited to about 40A by a glitch resistor. This gives a time constant in t; /archives//html/Amps/2002-01/msg00315.html (11,946 bytes)
157. [AMPS] Shunt regulated high voltage psu (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:42:59 -0000; --Original Message-- From: George T. Daughters <gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU> To: amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 30 January 2002 16:41 Subject: Re: [AMPS] S; /archives//html/Amps/2002-01/msg00316.html (10,134 bytes)
158. [AMPS] Shunt regulated high voltage psu (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:03:38 -0000; I can visualise a scenario where the control circuit is pulling the gate down because the o/p voltage is too high. Depending on the design, it might pull to almost ground via a resistor, maybe it's o; /archives//html/Amps/2002-01/msg00361.html (12,024 bytes)
159. [AMPS] Re: Bickering (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:54:39 -0000; Actually, Bruce, if you check the archives, you will find I am one of the more assiduous in removing large parts of postings before replying. Where I leave stuff in, it's because I think it's relevan; /archives//html/Amps/2002-01/msg00364.html (7,850 bytes)
160. [AMPS] Another Stupid Question (score: 1): Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson); Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 12:35:15 -0000; Sorry, attribution marks up the spout again. Good old MS. --Original Message-- From: Ian White, G3SEK <G3SEK@ifwtech.com> To: amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date:; /archives//html/Amps/2001-12/msg00016.html (10,289 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]