- 1. Re: [Amps] Step-Starts (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 08:06:56 -0700
- When switching from 2.5kV to 4kV the capacitors once again look like a dead short so now you are applying 1.5kV to a short as compared to the original 2.5kV to a short. Not a huge difference in the
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00464.html (7,030 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] Step-Starts (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 14:21:17 -0700
- Not relevant because the voltage applied across the short 120 times a second is not very high. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.cont
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00476.html (7,777 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] plate choke (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:06:05 -0700
- Oh yes it is, you have been using an approximate equation that ignored the effect of resistance. Jim, AF6O _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http:
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00680.html (7,898 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Amps] plate choke (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:39:00 -0700
- This mini thread is about a case where the resistance of the inductor WAS significant and possibly DID affect the resonant frequency appreciably. Jim, AF6O ___________________________________________
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00683.html (8,269 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 06:01:05 -0700
- All this time I have been thinking the point was to make your signal stronger. Jim, AF6O _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00169.html (8,409 bytes)
- 6. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 07:01:24 -0700
- Where I come from we use an amplifier to make a signal stronger and a car when we want to go somewhere. Jim, AF6O _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00173.html (8,563 bytes)
- 7. Re: [Amps] Energy stored in capacitor bank ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 08:04:11 -0700
- Yes _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00087.html (6,919 bytes)
- 8. Re: [Amps] Center Tapped Secondary Circuit (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:30:52 -0700
- Transient suppression. Jim, AF6O _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00459.html (7,088 bytes)
- 9. Re: [Amps] Series PC Power Supplies (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 14:21:47 -0700
- In what way is the load unbalanced and how would the diodes help? In a series connection all supplies have the same current and each contributes whatever voltage it is set to. How does one get to be
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00018.html (8,752 bytes)
- 10. Re: [Amps] Series PC Power Supplies (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 18:41:10 -0700
- Please explain that more clearly, especially the "opposite sense" part. Are you suggesting that the current somehow flows in the opposite direction through the supply in current limit? Perhaps you me
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00022.html (8,479 bytes)
- 11. Re: [Amps] Series PC Power Supplies (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 21:57:51 -0700
- So you are saying when the voltage drops the load draws more current. What kind of load is that and what is the application? Jim, AF6O _______________________________________________ Amps mailing lis
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00029.html (9,137 bytes)
- 12. Re: [Amps] resonance (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 07:08:06 -0700
- Needs more refinement! In a parallel tuned circuit containing resistance, Xl and Xc are not equal at the resonant frequency. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@con
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00119.html (12,694 bytes)
- 13. Re: [Amps] resonance (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 10:04:15 -0700
- Well it seems to me that the subject of resonance is about the fact that an oscillation applied to a resonant system produces the greatest effect in that system at a particular frequency. That freque
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00127.html (10,809 bytes)
- 14. Re: [Amps] resonance (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 11:24:19 -0700
- Amen! _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00134.html (7,372 bytes)
- 15. Re: [Amps] Parasitics & Filament Sag (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 07:39:29 -0700
- The problem is your courses only taught a superficial view of the subject based upon approximations. Peter is describing exact circuit analysis results and he is correct. Jim, AF6O __________________
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00069.html (9,145 bytes)
- 16. Re: [Amps] Parasitics & Filament Sag (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 08:13:34 -0700
- Yes, it's not only possible it is the norm, as has been discussed here endlessly over the years. Only in the case of a series RLC (and a few special cases of parallel circuits) will Xl and Xc be nume
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00071.html (8,858 bytes)
- 17. Re: [Amps] Parasitics & Filament Sag (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 09:17:36 -0700
- It's OK that you don't have an understanding of the principles of physics as applied to electrical engineering and circuit analysis. Just know that there are limitations to the approximate methods y
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00072.html (8,839 bytes)
- 18. Re: [Amps] Parasitics & Filament Sag (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 07:31:29 -0700
- An easy answer to your question is a parallel circuit consisting of a series R and L in one branch and a series R and C in the other branch. This circuit has two resistances but your formula only pro
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00074.html (9,633 bytes)
- 19. Re: [Amps] Parasitics & Filament Sag (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:01:26 -0700
- To Mike Sawyer: I sent a private reply to your private email but it was rejected by your server so I am sending it here. Mike, Yes you are wrong in your thinking, the approximate formulae that many h
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00084.html (10,298 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu