Mail Archive Search: <+from:jono@webspun.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:jono@webspun.com: 231 ]

Total 231 documents matching your query.

21. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 18 Jun 98 09:32:17 -0500; Did I ever say that? No. Someone questioned the fact that I stated that a resistor has a self resonant frequency. I have never claimed that it mattered in an HF amplifier. Also, I even stated in onc; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00200.html (8,252 bytes)
22. [AMPS] Quiet (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Fri, 1 May 98 00:22:42 -0500; Kinda quiet w/o Carl around isn't it? :-) I miss the OM. 73, Jon KE9NA -- Jon Ogden KE9NA http://www.qsl.net/ke9na "A life lived in fear is a life half lived." -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.co; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00003.html (6,326 bytes)
23. [AMPS] IM, Harmonics & Spurs ( was: Quiet) (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Fri, 1 May 98 10:32:38 -0500; We are both right on this one...let me explain: If you are driving an amp non-linearly with a CW signal, then no, you won't produce intermod distortion. This is the reason that a class C or a class; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00011.html (11,286 bytes)
24. [AMPS] Spectrum Analyzers (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Fri, 1 May 98 10:36:55 -0500; I would say that with the right set-up, you could go even lower. I know people who do IM measurements on connectors. The IM generated by a connector interface can be on the order of -125 dBc. And ye; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00012.html (7,784 bytes)
25. [AMPS] S/A for RF measurements (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Fri, 1 May 98 15:37:59 -0500; Ur welcome... I didn't want to mention it in my post but I can't remember if the following case will or will not happen in an amplifier. So if someone can confirm or deny this: If I am running two t; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00016.html (8,065 bytes)
26. [AMPS] 3CX3000A7 Filamen Choke (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Mon, 4 May 98 19:59:08 -0500; Hi guys, I don't know if bundling ferrite rods will work, but here is a suggestion that I learned from some other people out here on the mail reflector: If you wish you can just skip the chokes on t; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00035.html (8,683 bytes)
27. [AMPS] parasitics (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Mon, 4 May 98 20:00:42 -0500; WELL, IT WAS QUIET!!! :-) Carl, Re-read that...no one said anything about a parasitic cloud! It's an electron cloud. And yes, even I know that electron clouds form inside tubes. Sheesh! 73, Jon KE9N; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00036.html (8,351 bytes)
28. [AMPS] parasitics (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Mon, 4 May 98 20:09:35 -0500; Oh...so asking questions is now pointless? I see, we just gotta take everything on straight belief! Ok Carl, I have asked SEVERAL other times for theories for YOUR view of things, but haven't gotten; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00037.html (9,597 bytes)
29. [AMPS] 3CX3000A7 Filamen Choke (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Mon, 4 May 98 22:51:55 -0500; Thanks Rich! I forgot that part! 73, Jon KE9NA -- Jon Ogden KE9NA http://www.qsl.net/ke9na "A life lived in fear is a life half lived." -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissio; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00041.html (7,665 bytes)
30. [AMPS] parasitics (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Tue, 5 May 98 22:17:33 -0500; Uh..no you haven't. I have asked you several time to explain the Rocky Point effect or Gas Discharge theory for tubes. I have made several requests for this. I am curious as to why the filaments get; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00058.html (10,900 bytes)
31. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Tue, 5 May 98 22:34:33 -0500; OK, Thanks to those who responded to my seemingly dumb question about why no carbonization marks exist around tubes which supposedly had an arc-over in them. Specifically this is in regards to the be; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00059.html (8,977 bytes)
32. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 6 May 98 10:58:10 -0500; Dear Arlen, Thanks for your reply to me questions on arcing. Perhaps you are a genius and can remember everything you've every been taught in a classroom. I do not. Well, I went to the number 4 schoo; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00072.html (12,106 bytes)
33. [AMPS] FUTURE SS AMP (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 6 May 98 22:07:29 -0500; IMHO, yes you can do this sort of thing. However, it isn't easy and can be quite complicated. In my engineering days, I was part of a design team that developed several linear amplifiers that were f; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00080.html (8,849 bytes)
34. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 7 May 98 09:16:21 -0500; Agreed. I thought that this was how gas eminating from the metals in a tube was taken care of. I gotta question ya on this one, Rich. 73, Jon KE9NA -- Jon Ogden jono@webspun.com www.qsl.net/ke9na "A; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00085.html (9,079 bytes)
35. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 7 May 98 09:17:22 -0500; HUH? How can a magnetic field bend carbon? Last time I checked carbon was not a magnetic material. I think Carl here is just trying to throw stuff out here to confuse the issue. Junk science to coin; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00086.html (12,074 bytes)
36. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 7 May 98 10:20:46 -0500; What do you call cutoff? Zero mA plate current? It certainly wasn't keyed and was just idling. Even in class AB operation some current is likely going to be drawn as just quiescent current. Idle cur; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00088.html (10,830 bytes)
37. [AMPS] Education ( was: Another arc question) (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Sat, 9 May 98 10:35:32 -0500; Arlen, Thanks for the note. I appreciate it. And I was not horribly offended by your first note, nor did I think it was totally out of line. I agree with what you said. And you are correct, based on; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00122.html (9,892 bytes)
38. [AMPS] Another arc question (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Sat, 9 May 98 19:50:41 -0500; This is correct, Ian. There are times when using admittance parameters makes the mathematics easier. This is especially true when designing matching networks, particularly with a Smith Chart. Howeve; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00135.html (9,793 bytes)
39. [AMPS] Gases liberated in plate (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Mon, 11 May 98 16:36:03 -0500; Thank you. Thank you. Thank you! that the damage could be pretty extensive and not just minor. Sooooo....to bring up an old subject (I am good at that), it would appear to me at least that an arc wo; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00162.html (8,223 bytes)
40. [AMPS] Gases liberated in plate (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Mon, 11 May 98 20:00:51 -0500; Agreed, Carl. Yes it does. However, I still stick to my original question: Why don't we see more damage in 3-500Z's that arced. Why not melted grids, filaments, etc. Why just bent filaments? Is it b; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00165.html (7,600 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]