Mail Archive Search: <+from:kbills@yahoo.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:kbills@yahoo.com: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] High SWR (score: 1): Author: Ken-W9KB <kbills@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:22:01 -0800 (PST); I was looking around on 15m this past weekend for that elusive multiplier during the Sweepstakes and I noticed my exciter was folding back power as a result of a high SWR between it and my amplifier.; /archives//html/Amps/2008-11/msg00212.html (7,410 bytes)
2. [Amps] High SWR (score: 1): Author: Ken-W9KB <kbills@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:22:27 -0800 (PST); I was looking around on 15m this past weekend for that elusive multiplier during the Sweepstakes and I noticed my exciter was folding back power as a result of a high SWR between it and my amplifier.; /archives//html/Amps/2008-11/msg00213.html (6,933 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] High SWR (score: 1): Author: Ken-W9KB <kbills@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:48:53 -0800 (PST); Thanks for all the interest and help off line. It's always a trival solution in the end. Seems it was related to the inter-connect coax between the exciter and amplifier, it worked well enough on 80; /archives//html/Amps/2008-11/msg00218.html (6,930 bytes)
4. [Amps] Low Power (score: 1): Author: "Ken Bills" <kbills@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 19:25:40 -0500; While RTTY contesting this weekend, I wondered, since my amp still was warmed up, if it made sense to run the Alpha at 100 watts output, versus pushing the exciter at it's 100 watt limit. It only req; /archives//html/Amps/2009-03/msg00036.html (6,956 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Low Power (score: 1): Author: "Ken Bills" <kbills@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:35:35 -0500; Thanks for all the feedback. I especially like Carl's (KM1H) about running at 60-75 watts. I hadn't really given that a thought. 73 Ken-W9KB _______________________________________________ Amps maili; /archives//html/Amps/2009-03/msg00061.html (7,198 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]