Mail Archive Search: <+from:km1h@jeremy.mv.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:km1h@jeremy.mv.com: 3440 ]

Total 3440 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:43:05 -0400; Why on earth would anyone want to replace 3-500Z's with 4-400's in a SB-220???? First of all they have worse IMD in a GG configuratiion. Secondly they will not be cooled properly by the existing fan; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00381.html (12,343 bytes)
182. Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:48:05 -0400; Peter, just what would you consider a good economical tube if building from scratch for 6M? Ive not seen any REAL verified IMD numbers published for any Russian tubes except maybe the 4CX800 and have; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00382.html (9,457 bytes)
183. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 57, Issue 52 (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:04:44 -0400; There is some very good technical information buried in that post Tom. Ive edited it for future use to silence some naysayers. BTW, what is your waist size these days? And you certainly are no youngs; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00385.html (11,694 bytes)
184. Re: [Amps] How much electrolitic for a HV supply ? (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:10:13 -0400; RCA went as far as specifying PS C in their spec sheet for the 8122 family. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00386.html (9,564 bytes)
185. Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:24:33 -0400; I agree with all except the last sentence in part. The 3-500Z is a great tube on 6M and well within its 120 MHz maximum ratings. One 3-500Z will roughly equal a pair of 572B's in output and have bett; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00388.html (9,991 bytes)
186. Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:43:08 -0400; Which method of testing do you use and did you read Toms recent post? There is a huge difference between true real world IMD and the advertising departments way of rating it. Carl KM1H ______________; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00393.html (10,217 bytes)
187. Re: [Amps] No lids, no kids, no . . . (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:50:30 -0400; Mike was a riot and as many knew it was mostly an act. Another character was a Stanley from CT but I forget his call. Those were the days of my Viking I and HQ-129X which have recently been cloned he; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00395.html (10,220 bytes)
188. Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:08:05 -0400; I mean brand new, never mind the source. Most homebrewers couldnt even pronounce Pappenfus much less follow along. The stringent regulation is the rub. Ians kit isnt cheap either. I saw a partially; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00402.html (10,815 bytes)
189. Re: [Amps] Calling it as i see it (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:12:25 -0400; This thread was beginning to become rather PC and mutually beneficial until you opened your moronic yap. Apologies to the normal multitude and the administrator. _____________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00403.html (7,625 bytes)
190. Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:17:08 -0400; Try the 2 tone method which was the way I was taught many years ago when proofing military equipment. Both are acceptable as long as you are aware of the differences and can reference one to the othe; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00404.html (11,470 bytes)
191. Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:40:33 -0400; In that case I suggest that you recheck your measurement calibration as Eimac references to a single tone which gives an inflated result. Please read Toms posting from this morning, it explains in d; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00407.html (11,783 bytes)
192. Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:47:14 -0400; I wish Ian was back from holiday. He went thru this in much detail back when he was designing his regulator boards. However, dropping thru any high impedence is far from ideal be it via tubes, resis; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00408.html (9,266 bytes)
193. Re: [Amps] Amplifier Distortion / Tuning / Etc. (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:17:12 -0400; Well, I know where I was. Gainfully employed and not wasting my employers time on frivolous persuits. I sometimes wonder what several of these working hours responders do for a living or are they jus; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00415.html (9,379 bytes)
194. Re: [Amps] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:23:35 -0400; Barrie, The B&W FL6-1500 and the ICE 426 are the best high power ones Ive tested and not blown up. Both are in use here, the B&W on the regular station (1200W) and the ICE on my "conversion" bench fo; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00418.html (8,172 bytes)
195. Re: [Amps] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:18:21 -0400; Yes Peter; the early ICE's had some problems that were corrrected by direct replacement. This goes back 10-15 years ago so I can only assume that they are still good. Carl KM1H ______________________; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00426.html (7,803 bytes)
196. Re: [Amps] Super Cathode Circuit (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:39:12 -0400; The THP HL-1K ran a pair of 4X150/250's that way along with a swamped grid input. Schematic should be available on line. Supposedly it ran quite clean. Carl KM1H _____________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00431.html (8,081 bytes)
197. Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:48:02 -0400; I dont follow your statement Peter or is it a language problem again? (; Tom repeatedly bashes the super cathode circuit and Bill Orr in particular. Yet you say it suggests excellent IMD re: Pappenfu; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00432.html (9,158 bytes)
198. [Amps] 4CX250 IMD (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:06:25 -0400; According to my full size Eimac manual ( the yellow one with the multi page spec loose leaf sheets) the only 4CX250 style tube with decent IMD is the 4CX250R/7580 which was used in a lot of military; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00434.html (8,486 bytes)
199. Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:16:39 -0400; <SNIP> . This is much more prevalent in amateur radio I wish they did that back in the early 50's issues. I built a 6AG7-6L6 TX and could barely make a QSO a 1/2 mile away on 80M. Then I got a QSL fr; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00437.html (9,842 bytes)
200. Re: [Amps] 4CX250 IMD (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:29:46 -0400; I dont read all of your posts, especially when they ramble on and drift off. You certainly enjoy mentioning nichrome on at least a daily basis. Are you hoping Rich is lurking and youre just needling; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00439.html (9,792 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]