Mail Archive Search: <+from:mgilmer@gnlp.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:mgilmer@gnlp.com: 89 ]

Total 89 documents matching your query.

41. [AMPS] COAX (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 11:08:52 -0400; amp a At least while you're mobile ;) Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: o; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00450.html (7,141 bytes)
42. [AMPS] Re: Our CB Brethren! (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 07:41:16 -0400; A little like the "normal" use of the nitro motors they use to generate the power in the first place! Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00488.html (8,733 bytes)
43. [AMPS] Thanks, Dan. (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 08:11:05 -0400; and S impressive. Same "amount of illegality"? A thinking person (yes, even a lawyer too) could debate just the concept. Unless of course there's petit and grand excess. CBers amplifiers Hmm... true; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00489.html (8,378 bytes)
44. [AMPS] SB-200 Warc Mods (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 14:14:30 -0400; For reflector archives, use the new search tool on http://www.eham.net called eHamDetective. 73 Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Admini; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00532.html (6,862 bytes)
45. [AMPS] Have Cake & Eat it too (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 11:43:30 -0400; I have no experience with either antenna and certainly not with the two arranged as yours are. This is probably a topic for TowerTalk. Go to eHam.net and use the eHam Detective to search the reflecto; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00047.html (10,274 bytes)
46. [AMPS] Have Cake & Eat it too (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 12:50:19 -0400; My comment was specifically directed towards the issue that this person may have an interaction problem. Please read my post again if you doubt it. As such I am correct to suggest TowerTalk. As to th; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00049.html (11,523 bytes)
47. [AMPS] Have Cake & Eat it too (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 08:11:24 -0400; Wow. This is a very different scenario than what I first pictured/assumed (I know, I know) you were talking about. You seem to have several problems with your system and you need to isolate them or y; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00071.html (10,523 bytes)
48. [AMPS] Power Supply Spec Question (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 08:35:16 -0400; I believe ICS means Intermittent Commercial Service. What that implies I'll leave to the "lawyers" :) My guess is that the Astron will supply the full rated (70A) for several minutes, and then "expec; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00195.html (9,663 bytes)
49. [AMPS] Re: swr (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 15:02:33 -0400; I'll ignore all the imperfection problems (line bumps, poor directivity of meters, etc.) If the antenna/load impedance (at the far end) in question here doesn't match the line impedance, then the lin; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00291.html (10,703 bytes)
50. R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside? (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 13:00:44 -0400; The Eimac definition of R/XC1 is one. The other definition of Q is a lot more complicated and gives a different result. I use Eimac Q. I am lazy. "a different result" , huh? That says a lot. Mike N2; /archives//html/Amps/1999-08/msg00114.html (8,909 bytes)
51. [AMPS] Power Transfer (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:41:19 -0400; I'll risk sticking my neck out again into the battle (I learned something last time) Is it being suggested, in essence, that if an amplifier delivers (as per Bird wattmeter) 1500W RF to the coax, tha; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00324.html (7,204 bytes)
52. [AMPS] Good Meter vs CRT was Hot wire.... (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 12:23:32 -0400; on a limit I CAN imagine it - they give out tickets for going 62 in a 55 (same ratio). But, I don't think that's the point... or is it? :o) Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00565.html (8,809 bytes)
53. [AMPS] Good Meter vs CRT was Hot wire.... (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 12:38:47 -0400; What's a 1:3.0:1 VSWR? On Wednesday, July 28, 1999 6:32 AM, Jerry Devine [SMTP:krr2ak@juno.com] wrote: Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00566.html (8,732 bytes)
54. [AMPS] Good Meter vs CRT was Hot wire.... (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 15:45:38 -0400; Or a purple haze... ooh baby Mike N2MG [SMTP:krr2ak@juno.com] peak -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesti; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00578.html (9,864 bytes)
55. [AMPS] Good Meter vs CRT was Hot wire.... (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 15:47:11 -0400; Seems a lot like a high performance car - unless they catch you going little to say. 100hp or 400hp doesn't matter. However, I've read that the police often get (lame) excuses of a speeder's poorly-c; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00579.html (11,566 bytes)
56. [AMPS] Re: W8ji and Bird specs (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 08:28:12 -0400; Tom - that seems to be asking a lot! 73, Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00606.html (7,091 bytes)
57. [AMPS] Good Meter vs CRT was Hot wire.... (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 11:16:00 -0400; Easy enough - KA2RRK Guess he typed in while playing Jimi Hendrix backwards... Mike N2MG On Thursday, July 29, 1999 11:08 AM, Jon Ogden [SMTP:jono@enteract.com] wrote: much -- -- -- FAQ on WWW: http:; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00612.html (9,673 bytes)
58. [AMPS] parasitic fantasia (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 15:46:18 -0400; Careful Jon. Men of Science didn't really believe the Earth was flat. Mike N2MG On Monday, June 07, 1999 8:02 PM, Jon Ogden [SMTP:jono@enteract.com] wrote: But people once thought the earth -- FAQ on; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00275.html (7,849 bytes)
59. [AMPS] Arcing in air vs. arcing in a vacuum (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 11:21:29 -0400; <snip> So he has made the conclusion that if the breakdown potential of thin air is less than regular air, the breakdown potential of a vacuum is less still. I don't know if this jump can be made. Hi; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00189.html (8,362 bytes)
60. [AMPS] Arcing in air vs. arcing in a vacuum (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 16:38:42 -0400; Jon - another great thread in the making! Anyway, if breakdown was poor in a vacuum the Jennings folks would have had lots of trouble (or quite the scam going) :o) Ciao, Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00197.html (7,863 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]