Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:r31dmaeu@pc0312a.rz.unibw-muenchen.de: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] NCL2000 and WARC bands (score: 1)
Author: Claude Frantz <r31dmaeu@pc0312a.rz.unibw-muenchen.de>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 09:11:06 +0100
Can this amp operate well on the WARC bands ? Thanks a lot ! _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00139.html (6,431 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] GG Push-pull Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Claude Frantz <r31dmaeu@pc0312a.rz.unibw-muenchen.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:15:37 +0100
This multiband circuit was popular in some equipment. Basically, there is a parallel LC circuit with a serie LC in parallel to it. This same basic circuit is used in the Z-match. Have a look using yo
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00313.html (6,820 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] GG Push-pull Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Claude Frantz <r31dmaeu@pc0312a.rz.unibw-muenchen.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:31:59 +0200
Yes, you are right. Yes, you are right too. The problem is that here are many factors you have to master, so as the Q, the full band coverage and the second resonance. I think, it is not possible to
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00338.html (7,596 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Pi-L Network (score: 1)
Author: Claude Frantz <r31dmaeu@pc0312a.rz.unibw-muenchen.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:36:29 +0200
If you have a harmonics suppression problem, the Pi-L network will not be a great help for you. If you have to reduce unwanted signals below the operating frequency, the Pi-L network will not help at
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00370.html (7,518 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Pi-L Network (score: 1)
Author: Claude Frantz <r31dmaeu@pc0312a.rz.unibw-muenchen.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:13:05 +0200
Yes, it is better. But a little bit only. If you have a serious harmonic supression problem, it will probably not be sufficient. This is the reason why I think that it is not the preferable way to se
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00384.html (8,506 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Replacements for Carbon Composition Resisotrs (score: 1)
Author: Claude Frantz <r31dmaeu@pc0312a.rz.unibw-muenchen.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:35:04 +0200
Sometime ago, I have found a paper from the army about this matter. If I remember well, there was mentioned that the replacement using a newer technology is usually not a problem. The only problem ca
/archives//html/Amps/2007-04/msg00206.html (7,998 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Does coax loss depend on SWR? (score: 1)
Author: Claude Frantz <r31dmaeu@pc0312a.rz.unibw-muenchen.de>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:56:35 +0100
In the case of standing waves, the loss of the line increases. Further, the power handling capability of the line is reduced, i.e. the line can only handle less power. 73 de Claude __________________
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00030.html (7,325 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu