Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:sub1@rogerhalstead.com: 1109 ]

Total 1109 documents matching your query.

341. Re: [Amps] Vernier knobs? (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:36:48 -0400
Thanks for trying. It wasn't quite that straight forward...Entering "Jackson Brothers" into Google brought up many, many pages for entertainers, food companies, and many others. "Jackson Brothers cat
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00042.html (14,554 bytes)

342. Re: [Amps] Suggestion..... (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:37:55 -0400
I'd like to see it changed as most of my reflectors are that way. When I hit reply I want to send ONLY to the reflector, but I have to edit the addresses on nearly all posts because that goes only to
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00048.html (9,562 bytes)

343. Re: [Amps] Vernier dials, have one but... (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 01:03:16 -0400
Guess so... That was my first receiver. I built one from a kit even before getting my license. 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com ht
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00054.html (9,995 bytes)

344. Re: [Amps] Suggestion..... (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 17:13:43 -0400
I guess it just depends on what you are used to. As most of the reflectors I use are different than this one I've ended up posting a number of private replies to the group, yet I've not done one on a
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00066.html (8,146 bytes)

345. Re: [Amps] AL 1500 P.O. Meter Function (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:12:50 -0400
If you have a reactive load the power readings and the power will be different. In cases like these it's best to check out the amp with a dummy load. Check out the antenna(s) with a good bridge. If t
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00072.html (10,737 bytes)

346. Re: [Amps] SWR meters (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:09:57 -0400
No star washer? I've had very few problems with that type of connector and have some where around 20 in service as bulkhead connectors out in the weather, plus some in weather proof boxes that get re
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00096.html (8,981 bytes)

347. Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:44:08 -0400
That's one of the key indicators Carl! <:-)) 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00113.html (10,420 bytes)

348. Re: [Amps] SWR meters (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:56:44 -0400
After working on airplanes I've found it's often permissible to sacrifice (modify or build) a tool or tools to fit. I bend handles, grind down the wrench itself to fit the space or have some one put
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00126.html (9,186 bytes)

349. Re: [Amps] Pictures of number 1 (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:32:10 -0400
Once upon a time, or in another time (Pre Retirement) when I was gainfully employed, we'd design it, build it, get it to work, then rebuild it to make it look good, and then start over on getting it
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00138.html (9,624 bytes)

350. Re: [Amps] Eimac tube on the 'bay (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:16:15 -0400
We were talking about that one over on the Hallicrafters group last week. I thought it'd make a good, colorful addition to a restored HT-33B while keeping it all original. Don't spose that one had a
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00174.html (8,302 bytes)

351. Re: [Amps] Eimac tube on the 'bay (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:48:01 -0400
Yah, it looks like some of those pits are pretty deep and PL-172s are notorious for going gassy while the 8295As have a good reputation. Maybe that's why a good tested 8295 runs twice the price of a
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00177.html (9,294 bytes)

352. Re: [Amps] Eimac tube on the 'bay (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:35:42 -0400
I should add that the 8295A is relatively rare and when found in tested and in good shape are worth a small fortune. In addition to being metal/ceramic they are about a 1/2" taller than the glass/met
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00178.html (10,542 bytes)

353. Re: [Amps] Eimac tube on the 'bay (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:58:47 -0400
To an HT-33B? Not the GU-73BB? It and the socket are a *little* more money, but it is certainly capable of surpassing a few GS-35Bs <:-)) 73 Roger (K8RI) _____________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00184.html (14,137 bytes)

354. Re: [Amps] Blower Restrictor QU? (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:53:01 -0400
Comes up "Trouble accessing page". It appears to be blocked, blacklisted, possibly due to an infection 73 Roger (K8RI). _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesti
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00221.html (7,790 bytes)

355. Re: [Amps] Henry transformer info. (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:32:43 -0400
Yesterday there was an Alpha Project that had apparently been a botched 6-meter conversion of a 76A, or the owner just gave up. At any rate although it looked like crap, (a work in progress) it appea
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00223.html (10,030 bytes)

356. Re: [Amps] Blower Restrictor QU? (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:17:26 -0400
IF you want a "keppen da fingers out" type of cover, look at the fan grids used in computers. They exist in sizes from about 80 mm up through 140 mm, are inexpensive, cause little restriction, and wo
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00233.html (8,614 bytes)

357. Re: [Amps] tank calculations - need input (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:44:59 -0400
That's backwards to mine. Does the screw have right or left hand threads. If CCW would be backing the screw out it's pushing the plates closer together. The screw should be held in place so it can on
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00242.html (8,668 bytes)

358. Re: [Amps] Peter Dahl XFMR question (I Have one!) (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:03:30 -0400
As you apparently have no use for it, I'll bid twenty bucks to start things rolling.<:-)) 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00253.html (7,305 bytes)

359. Re: [Amps] KY-96A (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:17:25 -0400
Google comes up with a number of them ... for a price... Unfortunately those are the only ones I've found. I use the 12V version, but I don't have a service manual. 73 Roger (K8RI) __________________
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00303.html (6,889 bytes)

360. Re: [Amps] AL 80B (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:43:24 -0400
How about removing the ALC line and just applying a "little carrier" for drive? It's probably something simple with a new amp and as Steve said, a bit more information is in order. Follow the instruc
/archives//html/Amps/2009-10/msg00323.html (7,863 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu