Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+1500\s+Watts\s+of\s+Disipation\s+\-\s+Is\s+that\s+fair\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+1500\s+Watts\s+of\s+Disipation\s+\-\s+Is\s+that\s+fair\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] 1500 Watts of Disipation - Is that fair? (score: 1): Author: RobertW@ewol.com (Robert W. Stankus); Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 16:56:58 -0400; To my distinguished ham radio friends. Yes, 1500 watts is more than enough! Our cars today are cut back in effeciency to make our atmosphere cleaner and healthier. We deliberately retard the spark on; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00253.html (8,161 bytes)
2. [AMPS] 1500 Watts of Disipation - Is that fair? (score: 1): Author: RobertW@ewol.com (Robert W. Stankus); Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 16:56:58 -0400; To my distinguished ham radio friends. Yes, 1500 watts is more than enough! Our cars today are cut back in effeciency to make our atmosphere cleaner and healthier. We deliberately retard the spark on; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00254.html (8,178 bytes)
3. [AMPS] 1500 Watts of Disipation - Is that fair? (score: 1): Author: rfp@rfparts.com (Merit W6NQ); Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 19:26:14 -0700; To: <amps@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.co; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00264.html (13,422 bytes)
4. [AMPS] 1500 Watts of Disipation - Is that fair? (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 01:16:05 -0400 (EDT); Robert, People kill for less than that! Be careful........73 LOU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00270.html (7,053 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]