Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+30S\-1\s+power\s+output\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+30S\-1\s+power\s+output\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] 30S-1 power output (score: 1): Author: gm3woj@talk21.com (Chris Tran GM3WOJ); Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 15:32:43 +0100; Hi Jim et all 4CX1500B...has same screen dissipation (12W) but LESS (nominally zero W) grid dissipation. In many ways the 1000A is a better tube than the 1500B - you get just as much RF out with the; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00103.html (8,157 bytes)
2. [AMPS] 30S-1 power output (score: 1): Author: sheepdip@continet.com (Larry L. Ravlin); Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 09:22:20 -0700; If one takes his time and gets the proper fan (Grainger has them) the fan can be replaced and the air flow for the 4CX1500B can be increased albiet at the expense of more noise. Larry L. Ravlin AKA (; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00109.html (9,731 bytes)
3. [AMPS] 30S-1 power output (score: 1): Author: sheepdip@continet.com (Larry L. Ravlin); Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 09:25:29 -0700; Another tidbit, the 1000A is NOT a better tube than the 1500B for the simple reason of the grid structure. the grid of the 1000A is very fragile and will not withstand any Grid dissapation while the; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00110.html (9,780 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]