Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+AL800HX\s+vs\,\s+ETO91B\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+AL800HX\s+vs\,\s+ETO91B\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] AL800HX vs, ETO91B (score: 1): Author: morel.grunberg@telrad.co.il (Morel Grunberg); Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 11:04:07 +0200; Gerhard, As given in ARRL laboratory expanded test report: 1. Spectral purity: * 91B worst case: 52dBc@14MHz@1500W * AL-800H worst case: 45dBc@28MHz@1500W 2. Transmit two-tone IMD test @14MHz * 91B 1; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00027.html (8,443 bytes)
2. [AMPS] AL800HX vs, ETO91B (score: 1): Author: gburian@eunet.at (Gerhard Burian); Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 09:35:37 +0100; Hi specialists, my friends at the clubstation OE5XVL want to get some more power output and have taken the amplifiers AL800HX or ETO91B under a closer look. Any pros and contras are welcome, speciall; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00400.html (6,910 bytes)
3. [AMPS] AL800HX vs, ETO91B (score: 1): Author: rbkb8iii@erinet.com (Randy B); Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 11:36:26 -0800; Why don't you take a look at a Command Technologies HF-2500 It runs pair of 3CX800A7 tubes. It's the best amp I ever own. Good Luck & 73's Randy KB8III -- To: <amps@contesting.com> and -- FAQ on WWW:; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00403.html (8,012 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]