Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+AL800HX\s+vs\.\s+ETO91B\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+AL800HX\s+vs\.\s+ETO91B\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] AL800HX vs. ETO91B (score: 1): Author: ren22@juno.com (JAY W STURTEVANT); Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 16:32:36 EST; Why not consider the Command Technologies HF2500? I've had mine for a year and a half without any problems. Full power, fast and easy tuning, QSK, grid trip and more. (EXCELLENT IN A CONTEST) Pat Sti; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00013.html (6,846 bytes)
2. [AMPS] AL800HX vs. ETO91B (score: 1): Author: KA2YKC@aol.com (KA2YKC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 20:24:09 -0500 (EST); << << Why not consider the Command Technologies HF2500? I've had mine for a year and a half without any problems. Full power, fast and easy tuning, QSK, grid trip and more. (EXCELLENT IN A CONTEST) I; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00019.html (8,141 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]