Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+ARRL\s+and\s+QST$and\s+CW\s+Relevance$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+ARRL\s+and\s+QST$and\s+CW\s+Relevance$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] ARRL and QST(and CW Relevance) (score: 1): Author: leewical@lava.net (LEE ROGER WICAL); Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 08:57:00 -0500; Serious AMPers: Although all this subject matter of the ARRL is good, but does it really have to be on the AMPS reflector? I don't think so. So, why not address comments direct to K1zz@arrl.org and i; /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00543.html (10,355 bytes)
2. [AMPS] ARRL and QST(and CW Relevance) (score: 1): Author: johnf@futurenet.co.za (John Fielding); Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 21:29:14 +0200; Whereas I appreciate your concern about the subject being "off-beam" I believe myself and I suspect a lot of others like to "chew the fat" from time to time and take a very dim view of someone tellin; /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00544.html (9,663 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]