Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Alpha\s+86\s+Opinions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Alpha\s+86\s+Opinions\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Alpha 86 Opinions (score: 1): Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 01:32:35 -0500; Anybody know anything about this amp? As I recall, it wasn't on the market very long before it was replaced by the 89. The two amps look a lot alike. What are the differences? Were there any design o; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00134.html (7,051 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Alpha 86 Opinions (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 06:27:10 -0700; According to owners I have spoken with, returns during the warranty period seem to be over 1/3. cheers, Dick - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00143.html (7,202 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Alpha 86 Opinions (score: 1): Author: wosborne@utdallas.edu (William Osborne); Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 15:05:22 +0000; Hi Dick, Not sure where Rich's data comes from, but I owned an 86 for 5 years. No problems. I have an 89 now and I would consider the two amps equal in quality and peformance. Bill, K5ZQ -- FAQ on WW; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00149.html (8,095 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Alpha 86 Opinions (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 08:37:46 -0700; It came from owners who had to return 86/87s during the warranty period, Bill. Less than half of the owners reported having problems during the warranty period. cheers, Bill with - Rich..., 805.386.; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00154.html (8,912 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]