- 1. [AMPS] CW, the ARRL and QST (score: 1)
- Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 18:24:03 -1000
- It was written: And another wrote, in part: So then, it is the ARRL's CW mode position, as put forth in their restructuring proposal, and the earlier incentive licensing advocacy, that has caused the
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00441.html (8,336 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] CW, the ARRL and QST (score: 1)
- Author: kb0pyo@rconnect.com (Mark Brown)
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 23:28:40 -0600
- Hi All From the standpoint of a tech+ (yes I passed the 5 wpm exam after letting my license expire, went in cold & passed, came back no problem) the higher class licensees who sneer at us "poor" tech
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00445.html (10,916 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] CW, the ARRL and QST (score: 1)
- Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 23:30:43 -0600
- Ugh. It's the same arguement over and over. The fact is that CW is a skill and like any skill it can be learned and practiced. Yes it comes easier to some than others, but how many of those who "wor
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00446.html (10,724 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] CW, the ARRL and QST (score: 1)
- Author: andywallace@home.com (Andy Wallace)
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 08:28:03 -0600
- Mark I am sort of one of those Extras--I have some clues but they are limited-- and I don't think it makes me any less of a ham. I am agreeing with you and certainly don't "look down" on you--I just
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00471.html (8,086 bytes)
- 5. [AMPS] CW, the ARRL and QST (score: 1)
- Author: ve3bbh@interlog.com (Paul Hicks, VE3BBH / VE3ZT)
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 23:15:41 -0500
- Hi Jon, Your post was well-stated, in my opinion. 73, Paul. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00513.html (7,179 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu