Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+CW\s+amplifier\s+progress\s+$well\,\s+daydream\s+progress$\s+\-\-\s+lon\s+g\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+CW\s+amplifier\s+progress\s+$well\,\s+daydream\s+progress$\s+\-\-\s+lon\s+g\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] CW amplifier progress (well, daydream progress) -- lon g (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 04:03:27 -0800; ? indeed, or even a few hundreds of volts more. ? providing one does not send A-0/NØN ? No one needs instant on if they put an IR motion detector in the radio room which switches on the catho; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00338.html (9,005 bytes)
2. [AMPS] CW amplifier progress (well, daydream progress) -- lon g (score: 1): Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm, K4XL); Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 07:56:10 -0500; I really wish you technical weenies would stop making such sweeping judgments! Lots of folks need instant on! I need instant on! I NEED INSTANT ON!!! OK? I'm a DXer for Pete's sake!!! Slow warm up r; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00343.html (8,567 bytes)
3. [AMPS] CW amplifier progress (well, daydream progress) -- lon g (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser); Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 12:07:20 -0800; --115D12FDF3022D5A7BE2F6F8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit RIGHT ON KEN !!! W6RU --115D12FDF3022D5A7BE2F6F8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Conten; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00349.html (12,310 bytes)
4. [AMPS] CW amplifier progress (well, daydream progress) -- lon g (score: 1): Author: wb8jkr@juno.com (Mark S Graalman); Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 19:13:49 EST; Although I do understand what you mean, if you just turn on the amp when you turn on the rig there is no problem, so the issue isn't that one NEEDS instant on, but that one WANTS instant on. Personal; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00353.html (9,724 bytes)
5. [AMPS] CW amplifier progress (well, daydream progress) -- lon g (score: 1): Author: kf4kl@ipass.net (Doug Hall); Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 01:02:16 GMT; That hardly seems a satisfactory solution. I seldom use my amp, because I seldom need it. (I don't subscribe to any any of the 75m back-patting nets where I need to be 50 dB over S9 and have tubes wi; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00354.html (8,748 bytes)
6. [AMPS] CW amplifier progress (well, daydream progress) -- lon g (score: 1): Author: Bill_Henderson@ocdsb.edu.on.ca (Bill Henderson); Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 04:00:37 +0000; snip--snip--snip-- Of course, it is obviously impossible for the non-technical weenies to actually switch the amplifier on into a standby mode when starting the operating session - in which case the; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00359.html (10,506 bytes)
7. [AMPS] CW amplifier progress (well, daydream progress) -- lon g (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 07:05:56 -0800; ? Hear, hear. Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-R; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00362.html (7,317 bytes)
8. [AMPS] CW amplifier progress (well, daydream progress) -- lon g (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 07:06:00 -0800; An 8877 has a 50w heater. Is 50w a big deal? In this neighborhood, we're talking 1/2 cent per hour. Not if the heater is operated just above the minimum V spec. // I have seen Europe-California 80m; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00364.html (8,015 bytes)
9. [AMPS] CW amplifier progress (well, daydream progress) -- lon g (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 17 Mar 99 09:39:08 -0600; I thought that was just a phenomena that happened in the US! 73, Jon KE9NA -- Jon Ogden jono@enteract.com www.qsl.net/ke9na "A life lived in fear is a life half lived." -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.con; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00366.html (7,644 bytes)
10. [AMPS] CW amplifier progress (well, daydream progress) -- lon g (score: 1): Author: RFpower@radiodan.com (Radiodan W7RF); Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 11:42:18 -0800; Hi Peter, I think there are some who do as you suggest, many do not. Everyone's operating habits and concerns are a bit different. As a DXer and contester too, I sometimes find myself tuning around f; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00383.html (12,356 bytes)
11. [AMPS] CW amplifier progress (well, daydream progress) -- lon g (score: 1): Author: watson@epiloglaser.com (George K. Watson); Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 13:48:40 -0700; I am surprised that in all of this now one has mentioned the class E topology. For CW only use it is perfectly adequate and can be very inexpensive. There are parts available now with switching times; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00384.html (9,164 bytes)
12. [AMPS] CW amplifier progress (well, daydream progress) -- lon g (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 07:47:44 +0000; I'm intrigued - I thought that class E operation relied on the load being well defined, with load VSWR tolerance being poor, especially if you take advantage of the low dissipation to use small trans; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00397.html (8,519 bytes)
13. [AMPS] CW amplifier progress (well, daydream progress) -- lon g (score: 1): Author: Bill_Henderson@ocdsb.edu.on.ca (Bill Henderson); Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:06:07 +0000; snip--snip-- Finally, since when was anything that could be dignified by the name of beer need to be served cold? 73 Peter G3RZP --snip--snip-- Off topic, but I have found that most "domestic North A; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00404.html (8,887 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]