Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Carborrundum\s+Resistors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Carborrundum\s+Resistors\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Carborrundum Resistors (score: 1): Author: Larry Carman <lncarman@swbell.net>; Date: 15 Aug 2004 06:30:58 -0500; I have ten 890 AS carborrundum resistors. They are supposed to be 330 ohms 5% but they measure 400 to 500 ohms. Is it the norm that these resistors change that much with age? Are they still ok to use; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00134.html (6,671 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Carborrundum Resistors (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 10:49:22 -0400; Larry, Try adding a 30-33 pF doorknob cap to ground at the input of those resistors and see if it drops it. The old Collins dummy loads and some new ones uses this method to get rid of any inductance; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00139.html (7,428 bytes)
3. Re: [AMPS] Carborrundum Resistors (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 08:20:18 -0700; On Aug 15, 2004, at 4:30 AM, Larry Carman wrote: I have ten 890 AS carborrundum resistors. They are supposed to be 330 ohms 5% but they measure 400 to 500 ohms. Is it the norm that these resistors ch; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00141.html (8,372 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]