Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Conversation\s+Continuity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Conversation\s+Continuity\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Conversation Continuity (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 14:14:11 -0600; Am I the only one who has difficulty following WHO said WHAT in some of these never-ending debates? How about preceding YOUR remarks with YOUR CALL, sort of like reading a play where each line is pre; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00274.html (7,099 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Conversation Continuity (score: 1): Author: wa2moe@doitnow.com (Stu Greene); Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 12:36:52 -0700; Tom...you aren't the only one. Many of us are the victims of conversational oscillation -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests:; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00275.html (7,195 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Conversation Continuity (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Sat, 13 Dec 97 12:53:55 -0800; You should see the quoted text of each writer in a different colour, with a different number of greater-than characters (>) preceeding each quoted line. If an e-mail app. does not do this, it sucks.; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00276.html (7,399 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Conversation Continuity (score: 1): Author: wrt@eskimo.com (Bill Turner); Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 04:27:04 GMT; On Sat, 13 Dec 97 12:53:55 -0800, Rich Measures <measures@vc.net> wrote: _______________________________________________________________ Agent by Forte does this perfectly. It even gives you your cho; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00281.html (7,755 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]