Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Eimac\s+3CX1200D7\s+Component\s+package\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Eimac\s+3CX1200D7\s+Component\s+package\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Eimac 3CX1200D7 Component package (score: 1): Author: w2cqm@juno.com (Ronald Lumachi); Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 08:03:32 -0500; SELL: NIB (tested only) Eimac 3CX1200D7 (date code '97) complete with a brand new 6.3VAC@25amp filament xmfr, teflon chimney, Eimac SK410 air system socket, and a new HV 2amp+ parasitic plate choke.; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00320.html (7,731 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Eimac 3CX1200D7 Component package (score: 1): Author: w2ge@home.com (Phil Levin W2GE); Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 09:39:49 -0500; Any real advantage to running the 3cx1200D vs. the 3cx1200A??? Comparing data on the Eimac page other than filament voltage difference the tubes are VERY similar. Looks like the D7 might be easier to; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00321.html (7,969 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Eimac 3CX1200D7 Component package (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 08:53:46 -0700; not much if any. The advantage of the D7 is reduced feedback C. The Z7 is better yet. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissio; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00324.html (8,317 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Eimac 3CX1200D7 Component package (score: 1): Author: RFpower@radiodan.com (Radiodan W7RF); Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 13:05:51 -0800; Hi Phil, No difference in driving the tube and power output. Eimac rates them both the same. Perhaps, (read MAYBE) the D7 can be cooled slightly better since it has a larger anode cooling ring of fin; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00331.html (10,092 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]