Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Hold\s+on\s+\-\s+SWR\s+meter\s+placement\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1)
Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 06:03:04 -0700
To: <amps@contesting.com> Are you saying that if a 93-ohm swr meter were connected to one of the 50 +/- j0 ohm points it would read 1:1 -- the same as if the meter were positioned at the center of t
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00360.html (10,500 bytes)

22. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@pacbell.net (Michael Tope)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 07:03:17 -0700
Some folks are confusing a mismatch between the load and the line with a mismatch between SWR meter and the line. If the meter's characteristic Zo is different from the line Zo and the line is mismat
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00362.html (11,896 bytes)

23. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 10:20:19 -0500
Bob, The voltage on a coax due to an RF signal is a sinusoidal voltage whose period is 1/F. As with any sinusoid, the voltage of the signal varies over the course of its cycle. In a situation with a
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00364.html (8,767 bytes)

24. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 07:40:12 +0100
To: <amps@contesting.com> meter one of the 50 meter were section? No, it would read 1.86:1, the same as it would read anywhere along the 93 ohm coax. I'm sorry, but I can't continue this discussion a
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00422.html (9,973 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu