- 21. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1)
- Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 06:03:04 -0700
- To: <amps@contesting.com> Are you saying that if a 93-ohm swr meter were connected to one of the 50 +/- j0 ohm points it would read 1:1 -- the same as if the meter were positioned at the center of t
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00360.html (10,500 bytes)
- 22. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1)
- Author: W4EF@pacbell.net (Michael Tope)
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 07:03:17 -0700
- Some folks are confusing a mismatch between the load and the line with a mismatch between SWR meter and the line. If the meter's characteristic Zo is different from the line Zo and the line is mismat
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00362.html (11,896 bytes)
- 23. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1)
- Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 10:20:19 -0500
- Bob, The voltage on a coax due to an RF signal is a sinusoidal voltage whose period is 1/F. As with any sinusoid, the voltage of the signal varies over the course of its cycle. In a situation with a
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00364.html (8,767 bytes)
- 24. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1)
- Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 07:40:12 +0100
- To: <amps@contesting.com> meter one of the 50 meter were section? No, it would read 1.86:1, the same as it would read anywhere along the 93 ohm coax. I'm sorry, but I can't continue this discussion a
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00422.html (9,973 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu