Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Lets\s+chew\s+on\s+this\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Lets\s+chew\s+on\s+this\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Lets chew on this (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 00:26:46 -0500 (EST); Ok fellas, our gracious host would like us to start some stuff to hash over about amps and the like. How about this issue? the FCC rule on power used to be 2KW pep input. Now the rule is 1.5KW output; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00019.html (9,173 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Lets chew on this (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@worldnet.att.net (Tom Rauch (W8JI)); Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 08:22:30 -0500; The Bird reads average power, for a carrier free of amplitude change..average is equal to peak. On SSB, AM, or other amplitude varying modes, you won't have any idea. Yes. Slightly more than 1500 wat; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00026.html (9,917 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Lets chew on this (score: 1): Author: dhall@jps.com (Doug Hall); Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 11:00:13 -0500; No wonder you have such a big signal :-) Seriously, I'll be the first to admit that I'm no expert here, but this seems totally incorrect to me. What happens to the 1000 watts of reflected power? Does; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00028.html (8,269 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Lets chew on this (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 11:58:34 EST; Y'all gonna get a real lecture from Tom on this one Doug! The real answer is that the reflected power is retransmitted on the next cycle and on and on every microsecond or whatever. The only power lo; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00031.html (7,816 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Lets chew on this (score: 1): Author: dick.green@valley.net ("Dick Green".); Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 13:34:56 -0500; My two cents, also from a non-expert: I think Doug is right about the reflected power not necessarily being lost (i.e., being available to be radiated), but it depends on the impedance match between; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00035.html (13,694 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Lets chew on this (score: 1): Author: tskelto@ces.clemson.edu (tskelto@ces.clemson.edu); Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 13:38:25 -0500; BUT do YOU want 1000 watts of reflected power on your coaxial feedline??? Not me buckaroo..... You think you have RFI problems now? 73, Tom W4iU To: <amps@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.co; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00036.html (8,991 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Lets chew on this (score: 1): Author: dick.green@valley.net ("Dick Green".); Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 14:40:03 -0500; Assuming you are describing a situation where the transmitter and antenna system are not matched, I wouldn't say that the reflected power is "retransmitted" on the next cycle, but rather that the 10; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00040.html (8,916 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Lets chew on this (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@worldnet.att.net (Tom Rauch (W8JI)); Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 19:22:53 -0500; As a general statement we couldn't say what would happen. That's because the tube is not the source, it is a time varying resistance. The tube's dissipation is only (neglecting minor dielectric and r; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00047.html (9,669 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]