Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+MFJ\-259B\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+MFJ\-259B\s+Question\s*$/: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

21. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 21:58:00 -0700; His master's voice. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@cont; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00199.html (9,037 bytes)
22. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 21:58:03 -0700; This week, I was discussing a choke resonance problem on the telephone. The other party said that he had the dipper option on his MFJ-259B, but that it does not work correctly. Some ten years before; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00200.html (9,238 bytes)
23. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 21:58:02 -0700; Lap dogs are not trained to be friendly. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative reques; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00201.html (9,358 bytes)
24. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 05:56:49 -0700; Has anyone made a thorough comparison of the MFJ-259B with the AEA and Autek Impedance Analyzer's? The AEA seems a little sexier with the LCD graph display and computer interface, but I am wondering; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00202.html (10,318 bytes)
25. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 06:01:24 -0700; Hi Chuck, One trick that Dick Frey suggested to me a long time ago was to tune the antenna to 1:1 VSWR with an antenna matching unit, and then terminate the tuner input with 50 Ohms. You can then mea; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00203.html (10,002 bytes)
26. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 08:00:42 +0100; I I bought a MFJ484 keyer for the XYL some 14 years ago. The electronics is well made: the plastic laminate is tending to unstick from the case, and the holes for the monitor speaker are randomly dri; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00205.html (9,437 bytes)
27. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: dcckc@ncn.net (dcckc); Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 02:58:56 -0500; I for one meant nothing quite so malicious I just found it to be one of those humorous shock type moments and would have replied the same no matter who said it. I for one am not offended by any post; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00206.html (9,651 bytes)
28. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: ITR@Nanoteq.co.za (Ian Roberts); Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 09:59:14 +0200; The MFJ DSP filter box purchased from HRO works fine here after a few years. The DSP device is the cheapest available, but all parameters are more or less per spec. At the end of the day the idea is; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00207.html (9,676 bytes)
29. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 09:21:37 +0100; Ain't this the truth!!!!! But it don't stop some of them bitching about what they get for their money. Not, usually, those with any technical knowledge. But I hear some of them over here on 80m SSB,; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00208.html (9,070 bytes)
30. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 05:05:16 -0400; They all suffer the same external signal limitations because they all use broadband detectors. The 259 is more accurate than the Autek, and not as convenient as the AEA. The AEA "guesses" the sign o; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00209.html (9,199 bytes)
31. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 05:05:16 -0400; You must not have read Wil's comments asking people to behave Rich. 73, Tom W8JI w8ji@contesting.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00210.html (8,800 bytes)
32. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: W8AV@aol.com (W8AV@aol.com); Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 06:16:40 EDT; Hmmm, Guess I got slammed and let it go right overt the top of my head! Oh well, life goes on, and I keep measuring impedances!!!!! 73........de Goose W8AV -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FA; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00213.html (8,766 bytes)
33. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: oz1pif@get2net.dk (Peter Frenning, OZ1PIF); Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:08:02 +0200; Amen Ian.... I second your views 100%. I personally own the 259B, the MFJ-969 tuner and MFJ-4245MV Switch mode PS in addition to some minor items. All are excellent value for money, and give me a gre; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00223.html (11,477 bytes)
34. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 06:50:33 -0700; Firestone/Bridgestone made lots of money. Say what? Eimac recommends the use of a glitch resistor. The AL-1500 (8877) amplifier has No glitch resistor in the HV + lead. I pay $1.07 for the glitch re; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00224.html (10,120 bytes)
35. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 06:50:35 -0700; where have you been? We have a moderator (Will) I enjoy seeing lap dogs play the Ad Hominem Card. end - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FA; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00225.html (9,948 bytes)
36. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 06:50:39 -0700; All I asked is whether the dipmeter option worked. Reading between the lines, Joe's lit fuse tells me that he already knows the MFJ dipper option is a turkey. end - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00227.html (8,933 bytes)
37. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 06:50:36 -0700; money.... Purchasers of the dipmeter option reportedly get a unit that doesn't work. end - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submis; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00229.html (8,926 bytes)
38. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 07:14:35 -0700; Peter -- would you consider buying an 8877 amplifier that had no VHF suppressor and no HV glitch resistor?. thanks. .... - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://ww; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00232.html (8,973 bytes)
39. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 11:14:51 -0400; The dipmeter is a copy of a cover award-winning QST article that I warned Martin Jue about. He went ahead and did it anyway, claiming QST checked it out. He didn't know it was like the "Nearly Perfe; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00235.html (9,233 bytes)
40. [AMPS] MFJ-259B Question (score: 1): Author: stutz-jim@netdot.com (Jim Stutzman); Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:32:08 -0500; Hello All, I have been using a borrowed MFJ-259B to trim & tune a few antennas that I use. The box works fine for most applications and I will probably buy one for myself later on. HOWEVER !! The dip; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00247.html (10,578 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]