Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+MORE\s+ON\s+PEP\s+$TOM$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+MORE\s+ON\s+PEP\s+$TOM$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] MORE ON PEP (TOM) (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Fri, 7 Mar 1997 08:30:54 -0500 (EST); Tom, mentioned in a response to my mathmatical attempt to prove that PEP power is twice the average power. In his response he made mention of the term PEAK RMS value. This is an ambiguous statement,; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00076.html (9,037 bytes)
2. [AMPS] MORE ON PEP (TOM) (score: 1): Author: jmb@eden.com (John Bradley); Date: Fri, 07 Mar 1997 13:08:47 -0600; Lou, Tom was saying (I think) that Peak Envelope Power (PEP) is defined to be the average power during one RF cycle at the peak of the modulation envelope (usually audio frequency). As defined, PEP m; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00078.html (10,319 bytes)
3. [AMPS] MORE ON PEP (TOM) (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@worldnet.att.net (Tom Rauch (W8JI)); Date: Fri, 07 Mar 1997 22:51:57 -0500; Lou, Please do not re-phrase what I say in your "informational" posts. Envelope is the key word Lou. Peak ENVELOPE power. You can find this on page 6.7 of the '95 ARRL Handbook. The ARRL Handbook say; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00086.html (7,877 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]