- 1. [AMPS] More off subject about CW (score: 1)
- Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
- Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 12:14:34 -0500
- On Sun, 31 Jan 1999 09:10:43 -0600 Andy Wallace <andywallace@home.com> writes: Hmmm, And what was the WWV report ? What is your 40M antenna and height? Or did you consider that this is the CQ 160M CW
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00657.html (7,825 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] More off subject about CW (score: 1)
- Author: andywallace@home.com (Andy Wallace)
- Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 12:29:10 -0600
- Good enough to easily work East Malaysia What in the world does this mean? Are you suggesting all CW operators are on 160? nonsense! -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions:
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00662.html (8,704 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] More off subject about CW (score: 1)
- Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
- Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 16:10:37 -0500
- It is increasingly obvious that you are rather clueless in multiple areas. Bye Bye. 73 Carl KM1H BTW, I will be glad to try and educate you in a few areas if you wish to do it privately. OTOH, there
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00668.html (9,714 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] More off subject about CW (score: 1)
- Author: andywallace@home.com (Andy Wallace)
- Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 17:12:05 -0600
- Carl-- You are a pompus old fart--totally clueless in all areas--go back to your rocking chair. Andy K5VM -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Adminis
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00675.html (10,841 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu