Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+PEP\s+philosophy\/rules\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+PEP\s+philosophy\/rules\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] PEP philosophy/rules (score: 1): Author: gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (George T. Daughters); Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 09:26:26 +0008; Hi All, If I may, I'd like to start a "philosophical" thread which arises from: i) many of us home-brewing amps ii) tuning with a string of high-speed (i.e. high-speed compared to the time constants; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00157.html (9,128 bytes)
2. [AMPS] PEP philosophy/rules (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 10:28:02 -0700; ? FCC inspectors allow 10% for error, so the actual limit is 1650w. However, I know of instances where the 1650w figure was slightly exceeded without raising inspectors' eyebrows. The bottom-line is; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00159.html (10,551 bytes)
3. [AMPS] PEP philosophy/rules (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 20:05:19 -0000; Hi George - For one, I'm glad you brought this up. My understanding is that SSB PEP is one thing and the FCC PEP output rule is another. Actual PEP - if I understand correctly - is the power at the h; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00162.html (12,500 bytes)
4. [AMPS] PEP philosophy/rules (score: 1): Author: w1nr@eecorp.com (Michael McCarthy, W1NR); Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 19:38:40 -0500; I have never heard of anyone getting a citation out of the FCC for running a bit above the 1.5KW level. I do know of one who got writ up for running a 4CX10000 at 10KW out. I think the FCC even confi; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00168.html (7,796 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]