Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Parasitics\s+and\s+Blown\s+Filaments\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Parasitics\s+and\s+Blown\s+Filaments\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Parasitics and Blown Filaments (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Wed, 07 May 1997 14:38:02 EDT; Hi gang... I actually read Tom's response and laughed so hard that I accidentally deleted his message. Blown filaments are absolutely possible due to an internal tube failure. Consider the failure a; /archives//html/Amps/1997-05/msg00046.html (7,945 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Parasitics and Blown Filaments (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@connect.net (Phil Clements); Date: Wed, 07 May 1997 16:44:05 -0500; Far more filaments have been blown from the above than with inrush current. More than one of us would like to know a description of the parasitic suppressors installed on the AL-811 amp! Here Here!..; /archives//html/Amps/1997-05/msg00047.html (8,487 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Parasitics and Blown Filaments (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Thu, 8 May 1997 08:34:46 +0000; Hi Carl, You must have misread my comments. Parasitics are not a cause of blown filaments, but mechanical construction sure is...as is mechanical shock. My opinion is people who blame all these ampli; /archives//html/Amps/1997-05/msg00049.html (9,840 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Parasitics and Blown Filaments (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 9 May 97 10:16:49 -0700; Not Invented Here Syndrome. They are essentially the same design that Mr. Rauch submitted to N7WS during the VHF parasitics debate. Ls is made from copper buswire. At 100MHz, the Rp (parallel equiva; /archives//html/Amps/1997-05/msg00056.html (9,057 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]