- 1. [AMPS] Pi-L networks (score: 1)
- Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick)
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 12:47:23 -0000
- Does anyone have any comments about the Q of the L network section in Pi-L networks? I have seen it suggested that the impedance at the middle of the pi-L should be the geometric mean of the input an
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00188.html (7,720 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] Pi-L networks (score: 1)
- Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 19:53:03 -0500
- Peter, I thought the same until I started to actually use that concept Peter....wound up with higher than expected voltage at the Load capacitor....read "arcs". By formula that should not have occure
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00190.html (9,318 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] Pi-L networks (score: 1)
- Author: John Fielding" <johnf@futurenet.co.za (John Fielding)
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 14:23:14 +0200
- Hi Carl - I am currently designing my "ultimate amplifier" using a Pi-L network. Like you I struggled to calculate the necessary values, that is until I used the ARRL Radio Designer software! I desig
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00199.html (11,353 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] Pi-L networks (score: 1)
- Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 12:40:46 -0500
- Havent tried that software yet John; used to do it by hand but now using DOS based engr programs that my son got at college. Optimise how? What Q did you wind up with in the L? Works pretty good, the
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00204.html (13,233 bytes)
- 5. Fw: [AMPS] Pi-L networks (score: 1)
- Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 00:42:24 -0800
- On the second, third, and fourth harmonics? - later, Phil Rich. Measures.,www.vcnet.com/measures, 805.386.3734 -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com A
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00220.html (7,362 bytes)
- 6. Fw: [AMPS] Pi-L networks (score: 1)
- Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 10:35:48 -0500
- Thats OK for attenuation above 30MHz but does nothing for harmonics when operating on the lower bands. RF pollution is intense around this area particularly during contests. Many serious contesters a
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-11/msg00227.html (14,973 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu