Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Protection\s+in\s+cathode\s+not\s+plate\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Protection\s+in\s+cathode\s+not\s+plate\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Protection in cathode not plate? (score: 1): Author: wlfuqu00@pop.uky.edu (Bill Fuqua); Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 19:31:14 -0500; I knew something was bugging me about putting the fuse in the cathode ckt and it just hit me. If someone has already pointed this out forgive me for repeating it. I have not been keeping up with the; /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00533.html (7,549 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Protection in cathode not plate? (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 00:38:46 -0500; Hi Bill, Floating the grid in a triode from chassis ground does the same thing. If you float the grids, it's a good idea to take additional steps to protect the exciter from a HV dump through the ca; /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00535.html (7,836 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Protection in cathode not plate? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 06:29:21 -0800; With glitch diodes in the (cathode) metering circuitry, and a glitch R in the positive lead, the designer avoids such. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.; /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00538.html (8,118 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Protection in cathode not plate? (score: 1): Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 18:10:37 +0000; I just tried a SPICE transient model for the effects of an internal tube arc from anode to grid, from a typical B+ supply with 25uF charged to 3kV, with a 47 ohm glitch resistor. With typical "SB-220; /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00542.html (9,085 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]