Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+QRO\s+or\s+Commander\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+QRO\s+or\s+Commander\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] QRO or Commander? (score: 1): Author: w4th@webtv.net (Tom Hix W4TH); Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 06:44:35 -0600 (CST); On 02-27-00 you wrote: From: "Jim Heath" <jimheath@foothill.net> Subject: [AMPS] Commander and QRO Do you have any opinions on either Commander or QRO amplifiers? 73, Jim KB6SX -- Hello Jim, I select; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00599.html (8,844 bytes)
2. [AMPS] QRO or Commander? (score: 1): Author: n1rj@pivot.net (Roger D. Johnson); Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 13:10:47 -0500; I wonder how they get around 97.317 with it's drive power and gain restrictions? 73, Roger -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative reques; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00608.html (6,802 bytes)
3. [AMPS] QRO or Commander? (score: 1): Author: k1ta@contesting.com (Bob Marston); Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 18:15:27 -0800; To: <amps@contesting.com> limit + capabilities of their equipment in order to obtain a selling point with potential customers. list that is primarily intended for educational purposes intrusive and o; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00619.html (7,877 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]