Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+RE\:\s+Micas\s+and\s+DC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+RE\:\s+Micas\s+and\s+DC\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] RE: Micas and DC (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 08:49:42 -0000; I've never come across the idea of problems with DC on micas before. Most micas are DC rated, anyway. Never had any micas fail on me, either. In fact, in over 30 years in the business professionally; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00324.html (7,395 bytes)
2. [AMPS] RE: Micas and DC (score: 1): Author: donovanf@erols.com (Frank Donovan W3LPL); Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 07:24:34 -0500; I've been using twelve 0.02 uF micas in six monoband 3-1000Z amplifiers for over 25 years. After more than 500,000 DX QSO's they operate like they are eager for the next 500,000. 73 Frank W3LPL donov; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00326.html (7,642 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]