- 1. [AMPS] RE: Two Questions. (score: 1)
- Author: Peter.Chadwick@gpsemi.com (Peter Chadwick)
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 09:32:08 +0100
- No, it isn't. Let Ra = plate (anode) resistance VHF-Rp = Rp = the impedance of the parasitic suppressor at the frequency in question Rl be the impedance of the tank circuit at the frequency in quest
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00183.html (8,934 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] RE: Two Questions. (score: 1)
- Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net)
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 08:54:33 +0000
- To: <amps@contesting.com> Rich claims: Peter replied: Very true Peter, but you are beating your head against a wall. Again absolutely correct. 100 ohms special order carbon **composition** (NOT FILM
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00188.html (10,732 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] Re: Two Questions. (score: 1)
- Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
- Date: Tue, 09 Sep 1997 10:33:37 EDT
- It should vary depending on the tube used in a conventional single resistor suppressor with n turns of copper wire. Absolutely....in a conventional suppressor Peter. In Rich's and my approach the res
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00193.html (9,647 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] RE: Two Questions. (score: 1)
- Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 97 10:05:26 -0800
- Even basically? ok Series L-R circuits have impedance. Parallel L-R circuits have admittance. The parallel Ls/Rs VHF suppressor has a VHF admittance, which must then be converted to an equivalent im
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00200.html (14,469 bytes)
- 5. [AMPS] RE: Two Questions. (score: 1)
- Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 97 13:31:55 -0800
- To: <amps@contesting.com> ...snip... Apparently silver is out for VHF tank components, and nichrome is in? Rich-- R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.h
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00207.html (7,437 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu