Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+Antenna\s+System\s+power\s+ratings\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+Antenna\s+System\s+power\s+ratings\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re: Antenna System power ratings (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 10:13:56 +0100; My feeling is that a PL259 should be good to 3Kw in low SWR system - say <2:1. Although the Type N is rated to 1 Kw, I feel unhappy about putting over 4 amps through what is a BNC as far as the insid; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00294.html (9,346 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Re: Antenna System power ratings (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Tue, 20 Oct 98 09:09:15 -0000; Agreed on the N-connectors. I would think that a PL-259 would have a higher power rating than the N due to the thickness of the conductor. The center conductor of the N is really quite small and is; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00296.html (9,194 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Re: Antenna System power ratings (score: 1): Author: RFpower@radiodan.com (Radiodan W7RF); Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 10:06:34 -0700; Hello Peter and the group, I don't know how much the "ultimate" rating would be, but for example I have seen down at the HENRY factory 10KW put through their low pass filter with SO239 connectors on; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00302.html (12,002 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Re: Antenna System power ratings (score: 1): Author: John_Nelson@compuserve.com (John Nelson); Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 14:45:15 -0400; Message text written by Peter Chadwick Surely a doyen of the British amateur radio scene, ex-president and holder of assorted high offices in the RSGB, doesn't exceed the UK legal limit of 400W? John; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00303.html (8,377 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Re: Antenna System power ratings (score: 1): Author: LOMAX1@prodigy.net (frank ayers jr); Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 17:15:45 -0400; 400W? Aren't your limits 400 watts at the antenna? Frank W2FCA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00305.html (8,336 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Re: Antenna System power ratings (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 22:32:50 +0100; N connectors will handle high power, but only if they are in good condition, perfectly assembled and perfectly mated. Otherwise they're just coaxial fuses. That's really asking for trouble, because a; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00306.html (10,637 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Re: Antenna System power ratings (score: 1): Author: John_Nelson@compuserve.com (John Nelson); Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 17:59:38 -0400; Message text written by Jon Ogden talking about currents on an antenna....... Yes. Peter's been caught 'bang to rights', as the UK criminal fraternity is supposed to say when arrested :) Oh....who me; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00308.html (8,838 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Re: Antenna System power ratings (score: 1): Author: John_Nelson@compuserve.com (John Nelson); Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 17:59:41 -0400; Message text written by INTERNET:LOMAX1@prodigy.net Generally yes, although a few (about 20, I believe) have special permits to run 1kW. I seem to remember that these are specific to a given band and; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00309.html (8,463 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Re: Antenna System power ratings (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Tue, 20 Oct 98 19:40:48 -0000; I think this is what my customer determined. That the "unsure" matability of the Ns in a blind mate configuration was giving them trouble. Everything was switched to screw on N-Connectors or 7/16th'; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00315.html (9,800 bytes)
10. [AMPS] Re: Antenna System power ratings (score: 1): Author: conrad.farlow@virgin.net (Conrad Farlow); Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 02:28:24 +0100; Hi John these are obviously theorectical watts :) 73 de Conrad G0RUZ -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contes; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00317.html (9,091 bytes)
11. [AMPS] Re: Antenna System power ratings (score: 1): Author: John_Nelson@compuserve.com (John Nelson); Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 06:17:58 -0400; Message text written by Mike Willis Ah yes. What's the quotation from Hamlet about a custom more honoured in the breach than in the observance? <g> John Nelson GW4FRX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contes; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00334.html (8,261 bytes)
12. [AMPS] Re: Antenna System power ratings (score: 1): Author: John_Nelson@compuserve.com (John Nelson); Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 06:18:00 -0400; Message text written by INTERNET:conrad.farlow@virgin.net Indeed. Must be peak-music-power watts, or PMPO watts <g>. John Nelson GW4FRX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submission; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00335.html (8,090 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]