Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+N\s+connectors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+N\s+connectors\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re: N connectors (score: 1): Author: w7iuv@axtek.com (Larry Molitor); Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 00:48:10 +0100; Ahh! N connectors, one of the things that causes me to get up on the soap box. Here goes.... If I remember the Mil Spec right, N connectors are rated at 800 watts max at 150 Mhz. So are BNC's, TNC's; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00316.html (10,185 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Re: N connectors (score: 1): Author: davidc@bit-net.com (DavidC); Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 23:21:24 -0400; when You'll sure be famous ... and poor ... if you run 10KW and get caught! :-) 73, DavidC AA1FA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00319.html (7,347 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Re: N connectors (score: 1): Author: johnf@futurenet.co.za (John Fielding); Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 18:53:25 +0200; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_01BDFD24.154782E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit N connectors are rated to at least 5kW at; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00344.html (16,707 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Re: N connectors (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 00:50:13 -0400; You forgot to specify a frequency John. The world does not end at 30MHz. There is no way Jose, you will run a N on 432 MHz at 1500W CCS even below sea level. I believe the N carries a Mil and commerc; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00353.html (20,915 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Re: N connectors (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 11:36:27 +0100; For those of us who weren't lucky enough to be taught properly, the "improved" N connectors with a captive pin and a top-hap braid ferrule are MUCH easier to assemble correctly. There's no braid to c; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00355.html (8,700 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Re: N connectors (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 08:27:34 +0100; snip Not all brands cope with both. The most common one in UK is Greenpar (now part of M/A Com) which is a very good connector but which won't take double screen without reaming out the clamping nut.; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00362.html (7,971 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Re: N connectors (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 23:56:15 -0400; On Thu, 22 Oct 1998 08:27:34 +0100 Steve Thompson <amps@txrx.demon.co.uk> writes: I was thinking primarily of Amphenol who was a principle Mil-Spec supplier for ages. BTW, does anyone know the source; /archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00368.html (9,753 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]