Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+Serious\s+commentary\s+from\s+N4XY\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+Serious\s+commentary\s+from\s+N4XY\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re: Serious commentary from N4XY........................ (score: 1): Author: W4EF@pacbell.net (Michael Tope); Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 18:09:59 -0000; In terms of effective data rates, it should be noted that maximum phone QSO rates in contests are typically only 2 to 3 times higher than CW rates ( a good phone op in the Carribean can do 300 - 400; /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00540.html (7,604 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Re: Serious commentary from N4XY........................ (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 16:42:02 -0500; On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 18:09:59 -0000 Michael Tope <W4EF@pacbell.net> writes: True up to a point. The pro SSB op can usually maintain that rate over time as compared to CW which is more physical. It has; /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00609.html (9,149 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]