Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Review\s+of\s+Palstar\s+Antenna\s+Tuner\s+from\s+Dayton\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Review\s+of\s+Palstar\s+Antenna\s+Tuner\s+from\s+Dayton\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Review of Palstar Antenna Tuner from Dayton (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:04:48 -1000; Have had the Palstar AT4K here since setting up my big Henry amplifier. They get along just fine together. A "feature" about the Palstar: the roller L is made for them by Henry Radio! It bears a very; /archives//html/Amps/2001-06/msg00168.html (10,438 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Review of Palstar Antenna Tuner from Dayton (score: 1): Author: wd7s@ARRL.NET (Paul Hewitt); Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:21:09 -0700; That's interesting Jim. According to an e-mail two weeks ago from Paul Hrivnak at Palstar the RI28HP roller inductor used in the AT4K tuner is made from scratch at their facility. I can't speak for t; /archives//html/Amps/2001-06/msg00173.html (12,670 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Review of Palstar Antenna Tuner from Dayton (score: 1): Author: wd7s@ARRL.NET (Paul Hewitt); Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:38:03 -0700; I thought that might be the case Jim, I hope the change is for the better, call me an optimist! Paul Paul Hewitt WD7S PRODUCTIONS QRO HOMEBREW COMPONENTS http://wd7s.home.att.net -- FAQ on WWW: http:; /archives//html/Amps/2001-06/msg00175.html (8,733 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Review of Palstar Antenna Tuner from Dayton (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 22:04:19 -0500; I think Paul is correct. The inductor in my tuner is NOT the one shown in the AT4K picture. I believe they did do some changes. I believe the quality of the inductor is good. I looked it over pretty; /archives//html/Amps/2001-06/msg00177.html (8,613 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]