Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Roller\s+Inductors\s+vs\.\s+Bandswitches\s+\.\.\.\s+which\s+is\s+best\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Roller\s+Inductors\s+vs\.\s+Bandswitches\s+\.\.\.\s+which\s+is\s+best\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Roller Inductors vs. Bandswitches ... which is best? (score: 1): Author: K4MO@carolina.rr.com (K4MO); Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:55:35 -0500; I have just about collected all the parts to build my next project and I will soon be faced with the decision of how to switch bands with the final tank circuit. I see three options: 1. Use the EF Jo; /archives//html/Amps/2001-02/msg00159.html (9,008 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Roller Inductors vs. Bandswitches ... which is best? (score: 1): Author: kt4ja@cfl.rr.com (Walter Dail); Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:32:32 -0500; Theo, I'd like to see the info posted to the reflector. It would be good to consider the pros and cons of a roller. I've been contemplating the same thing. I've got a roller in my Johnson Thunderbolt; /archives//html/Amps/2001-02/msg00161.html (10,453 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Roller Inductors vs. Bandswitches ... which is best? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:08:44 -0800; The 222 is good for 15 out. No. Parasitic resonance exists before one gets to the tank inductor. cheers, Theo - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contestin; /archives//html/Amps/2001-02/msg00162.html (9,130 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Roller Inductors vs. Bandswitches ... which is best? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:13:05 -0800; general coverage is an advantage. cheers, Walter. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrati; /archives//html/Amps/2001-02/msg00163.html (8,300 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Roller Inductors vs. Bandswitches ... which is best? (score: 1): Author: w1nr@eecorp.com (Mike McCarthy, W1NR); Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:35:01 -0500; Theo, A roller inductor will give you "general coverage" as well as being able to fine tune each band better than with fixed taps. However, there is an added circuit to adjust every time you change b; /archives//html/Amps/2001-02/msg00164.html (8,581 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Roller Inductors vs. Bandswitches ... which is best? (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:46:10 -0600; . I've been contemplating the same thing. I've got I don't know if you are planning on 160-10 meters, but I too like the way Henry does it. Their roller coils are ganged together so that the Pi and L; /archives//html/Amps/2001-02/msg00166.html (8,968 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Roller Inductors vs. Bandswitches ... which is best? (score: 1): Author: wc6w@juno.com (Radio WC6W); Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 23:03:27 EST; Hi Theo, final for the and Rollers work great. And they do seem to be the military HF amplifier's preferred component in this application. coil, That's a good approach, too. Perhaps, better in the ol; /archives//html/Amps/2001-02/msg00167.html (11,545 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Roller Inductors vs. Bandswitches ... which is best? (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:34:39 -0000; Fair Radio Sales (http://www.fairradio.com/index.html) have ex BC375 switches at $3.95 or 10 for $32. They are on their 'special offer' page. These are big 1p 6way 30 degree indexing types, and they'; /archives//html/Amps/2001-02/msg00170.html (9,985 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Roller Inductors vs. Bandswitches ... which is best? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 00:50:36 -0800; 9 bands is a handful for a switch. . cheers, Mike - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrati; /archives//html/Amps/2001-02/msg00172.html (8,646 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]