Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+SB\-220\s+Rating\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+SB\-220\s+Rating\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] SB-220 Rating (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Mon, 8 Sep 1997 08:27:35 +0000; To: <amps@contesting.com> Not so far as I know or Heathkit knew. Let's see. The maximum key down input power rating is 1000 watts dc plate input on CW. The efficiency on a good day with a good 220 i; /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00160.html (10,321 bytes)
2. [AMPS] SB-220 Rating (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Mon, 08 Sep 1997 12:42:26 EDT; On Mon, 8 Sep 1997 08:27:35 +0000 w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net writes: To: <amps@contesting.com> Yep, but you have a way with words that bears watching. That "indicated" reading on SSB was rea; /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00166.html (12,115 bytes)
3. [AMPS] SB-220 Rating (score: 1): Author: k6ll@juno.com (David O. Hachadorian); Date: Mon, 08 Sep 1997 13:25:43 EDT; Electronic Bias Switching is a wonderful mod to the SB-220. It takes a substantial load off the power supply in cw and ssb, and allows the entire amp to run cooler. The cw/ssb switch can then be conv; /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00167.html (8,598 bytes)
4. [AMPS] SB-220 Rating (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Mon, 8 Sep 97 11:46:05 -0800; If the EBS is controlled by the current through the coils of the RF relays, yes. If the EBS is controlled by the level of RF drive, no. Rich-- R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K -- FAQ on WWW: http:; /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00172.html (6,695 bytes)
5. [AMPS] SB-220 Rating (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Mon, 08 Sep 1997 19:31:53 EDT; On Mon, 08 Sep 1997 13:25:43 EDT k6ll@juno.com (David O. Hachadorian) writes: Absolutely correct Dave; if done similar to Rich's kits. Just dont follow some of the magazine articles. The SB-220 owes; /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00178.html (8,882 bytes)
6. [AMPS] SB-220 Rating (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 08:07:07 +0000; To: <amps@contesting.com> Hi Carl, You'll NEVER find a post where I said the 220 was poorly designed, just like you'll probably never have the technical ability to understand you multiply efficiency; /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00187.html (9,829 bytes)
7. [AMPS] SB-220 Rating (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Tue, 09 Sep 1997 12:37:18 EDT; On Tue, 9 Sep 1997 08:07:07 +0000 w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net writes: To: <amps@contesting.com> I dont know, I usually delete most of your posts immediately after reading. Maybe Rich has a be; /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00199.html (12,919 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]