Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+SB\-221\s+Suppresion\s+on\s+10\s+Meters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+SB\-221\s+Suppresion\s+on\s+10\s+Meters\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] SB-221 Suppresion on 10 Meters (score: 1): Author: KF0FX@aol.com (KF0FX); Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 19:10:05 EDT; I have an SB-221 who's history is as follows: 1) Bought used in 1991 with original Eimac tubes (1982). Well constructed. 1,350 watts out. Nice, no problems. 2) 1996. Joined USAF MARS. Found SB-221 wo; /archives//html/Amps/1998-04/msg00298.html (8,563 bytes)
2. [AMPS] SB-221 Suppresion on 10 Meters (score: 1): Author: KF0FX@aol.com (KF0FX); Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 19:41:53 EDT; << Chris, I'm curious about your big event - was the SB-221 keyed at the time? If you were listening, with the tubes cut off, sounds like it wasn't a parasitic. The amp was in Rx mode at the time. Tu; /archives//html/Amps/1998-04/msg00314.html (7,531 bytes)
3. [AMPS] SB-221 Suppresion on 10 Meters (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Tue, 28 Apr 98 02:38:55 -0800; Amen, Chris. Looking at circumstantial evidence is about it, for which a high-pot. tester comes is useful. cheers Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/; /archives//html/Amps/1998-04/msg00316.html (7,935 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]