Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+SB220\/SB221\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+SB220\/SB221\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] SB220/SB221 (score: 1): Author: banderso@eni.net (Barry Anderson); Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 15:42:42 -0500; Carl ... A BIG AMEN (!!) here. I do enjoy technical debates, but it seems to me that whatever the debate is, it eventually swings over to this subject. I really gets old, and hurts the opinions the r; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00060.html (7,151 bytes)
2. Fw: [AMPS] SB220/SB221 (score: 1): Author: kn6dv@qnet.com (KN6DV); Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 01:46:41 -0000; Sorry about that, the correct URL is: http://www.av.qnet.com/~kn6dv thanks 73 Will -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00003.html (7,764 bytes)
3. [AMPS] SB220/SB221 (score: 1): Author: schaier@avotec.com (Len Schaier); Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 15:46:18 -0500; To all, I want to thank you all for the good scoop. I assume the responces have been coming from SB 220 or SB 221 owners. Is that a fair one? Do other 3-500 z amplifiers exhibit the same spitting/arc; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00329.html (7,538 bytes)
4. Fw: [AMPS] SB220/SB221 (score: 1): Author: kn6dv@qnet.com (KN6DV); Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 00:00:38 -0000; -- To: <amps@contesting.com> I the -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@cont; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00332.html (8,654 bytes)
5. [AMPS] SB220/SB221 (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 09:10:32 +0000; Len, This stuff isn't strange at all. Nearly all amps will arc if driven with modest to high drive power when the tank is undercoupled to the load. The tank has all that energy, and it has to do SOM; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00337.html (8,758 bytes)
6. [AMPS] SB220/SB221 (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Mon, 24 Nov 97 11:48:39 -0800; During a telephone conversation with Mr. Rauch in late-1990, he told me that he had seen plenty of parasitic damage in the 400 SB-220s that he had repaired. Mr. Rauch did not design the SB-220. If y; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00343.html (8,349 bytes)
7. [AMPS] SB220/SB221 (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 08:54:56 +0000; Nonsense Rich. You distort everything you hear to support your kit sales. I did tell you very clearly that the 220 had a problem with VLF parasitics on occasion from the parallel tuned circuit in th; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00361.html (8,909 bytes)
8. [AMPS] SB220/SB221 (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 26 Nov 97 16:16:26 -0800; ...the profits of which supposedly go to the svelte, gorgeous, 22-year old secretary who allegedly licks more than Rich's envelopes, on and on. Indeed you did mention this scenario. However, it didn; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00370.html (9,543 bytes)
9. [AMPS] SB220/SB221 (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 20:15:02 EST; Lots of SNIPS...not worth repeating So why dont one of you guys prove that one way or another. Set up a SB-220 at a neutral location and have at it. Just stop the bull shit here. Rich you seem to hav; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00372.html (10,715 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]