Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Stability\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Stability\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Stability (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 17:16:53 +0100; Hi all, Dayton was great - sorry I missed meeting W8JI. 'Unconditional Stability' has a very particular meaning to me - that's the ratios of the various S (or y or z or whatever) parameters give a va; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00392.html (7,064 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Stability (score: 1): Author: w7iuv@axtek.com (Larry Molitor); Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 00:09:13 +0100; Peter, as I was about to hit the 'send' button for the post where I critized Tom's use of the *unconditionaly stable* term, I thought to myself: 'bet one of the English chaps brings up Linville'. It'; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00406.html (7,775 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Stability (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 08:24:33 +0100; There's a button somewhere on your fancy HP Network Analyzer that will plot a sweep of Linvill's K. It's used all the time in trying to design unconditionally stable lownoise amplifiers. If you think; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00419.html (7,921 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]